City Ordered to Rehire Fired Attleboro Firefighter/EMT

Massachusetts Civil Service Commission's decision states William Dunn was "not milking the system."

The . has ordered the city to rehire William Dunn, an Attleboro firefighter of 16 years who was suspended then fired from his job in 2009. Dunn was fired after it was discovered he was still working in his other job while on "line of duty leave" from the AFD.

The Massachusetts Civil Service Commission said Dunn's case did not show an "employee who is milking the disability system at taxpayer expense" by managing his maintenance business, Consider it Dunn, while on  leave for an injury to his knee.

Dunn, who made approximately $46,000 with the AFD, was observed by a private investigator who reported the firefighter was seen climbing into the truck, picking up the piece of power equipment and handing it to one of the other men, and throwing a bundle of wooden stakes out of the truck and observed lifting large pieces of drywall up out of the truck.

He was also allegedly observed kneeling by a boy who had been involved in an accident on his bicycle. The PI's report states that Dunn stopped his truck and crossed the street where he stood over the boy, and bent down with his “legs spread wide as he bent down to tend to the boy."

In his testimony Dunn disputes some of the PI's findings and the Commission's decision states that Dunn was not milking the system. 

In fact, Commissioner Paul Stein states in the 35-page decision that to the contrary, "Dunn was dutifully complying with all reasonable advice he had received from his treating physicians and therapists who honestly believed, as did he, that their course of treatment was medically necessary to bring him to the point at which he safely could return to the job he loved."

The decision goes on to say that the firefighter/EMT devoted 20 or more hours per week in treatment before Attleboro pulled the plug.

It also states, however, that the city correctly points out that it is not within the Commission’s purview to make a determination whether Dunn was, or now is, fit to return to full duty, but only whether Attleboro proved by a preponderance of substantial evidence that, from October 2008 through April 2009, Dunn misrepresented his condition as worse than he knew, or reasonably should have known, it to be. 

"He shall be reinstated to his position as an AFD firefighter/EMT without loss of any benefits to which he is entitled on or after April 9, 2009," the decision by Commissioner Paul Stein states. "Nothing in this decision, however, is intended to establish the specific employment status to which the Appellant should be reinstated (for example, limited duty, full duty or LOD leave).

Former Attleboro Fire Chief Ronald Churchill would not comment on the Commission's decision, but said "Mayor (Kevin Dumas) and Chief (Scott Lachance) will have to deal with the costs and effect this ruling will have on the department."

City officials did not respond to request for comment on the Commission's decision and whether an appeal of the decision will be filed. The law firm representing Dunn, Pyle Rome Ehrenberg, could not be reached for comment. Calls to a number associated with "Consider it Dunn," went unanswered.

If a file for a motion is filed, it must be done within 10 days of receiving the Commission's decision, which is dated June 2, 2011.

Lee Holt June 10, 2011 at 06:47 PM
I agree with firefighter Jacques (on one point, that is). It is the facts (and not the "factfinders" at civil service) that matter most. The decision seems to place a great deal of emphasis on some sort of surveilance video. Could Patch get a copy of that video for all of us to see? If a picture is worth a 1000 tales, imagine what a video is worth.
Stephen Jacques June 10, 2011 at 06:52 PM
I will not respond to anyone who lacks the courage to sign their name to what they post. Sorry Bob or whoever you are.
RUKIDINME June 11, 2011 at 09:14 PM
Wow Leeroy and Boob seem to be happy with the cities agents (mayor, fire chief, city personnel/lawyer) being on a vendetta and costing the city more than $100,000 as performing their jobs admirably. Instead they broke the law, had a Doctor order him back to work with out examining the patient or reviewing the MRI's, and not relying on the specialists. As far as the video evidence presented by the city; this was all proven false prior to Dunn being fired. No wallboard, no heavy tools being lifted, no kneeling on bad knee. What was learned was all these accusations were false. This included the fact that he used a step to get in the truck. Unjust termination, be enlightened and read the hearing transcript. Can u say witch hunt?
RUKIDINME June 11, 2011 at 10:32 PM
Boob, He was not observed doing strenuous activity. Not lifting wallboard, not stakes, not heavy equipment/tools, not kneeling on bad knee. How about reading the hearing transcript and decision. As a taxpayer you should be offended by your city officials that broke the law by firing Mr. Dunn. By now Mr. Dunn would have been back to work or if unable to perform the job retired. What is the cost? Hey ask the chief, mayor, or city lawyer. I'm sure you will get a "NO COMMENT" answer. Much like the chief said.
RUKIDINME June 11, 2011 at 10:39 PM
I agree with you completely!! The ignoramus Bob is actually spelled Boob.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »