.

The NRA on Mental Illness: A Complete Lack of Understanding

Lunatic (or crazy) is not a legal, medical or psychiatric term. It is a leftover slur from an earlier time of lesser understanding.

On Sunday, Dec. 23, 2012 the NBC program Meet the Press, NRA CEO and Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre repeatedly called people afflicted or suffering from mental illness who may do harm "lunatics." This view is so completely out of touch with what it means to be a person suffering from a mental illness that Mr. LaPierre has just made his point of view and that of the NRA irrelevant to any mental health advocacy and reform in America.

A Complete Lack of Logic

CEO LaPierre's comments on mental illness are completely devoid of any logic. Repeatedly calling someone suffering from mental illness a lunatic and getting this person off the street just doesn't make sense. It is the action that consequently defines the person as a so-called "lunatic" or criminal. And no one is a criminal until that person commits a crime.

We all know someone who is or has suffered from mental illness or a neuro-developmental disability in one form or another. People afflicted from a mental illness are not considered a criminal until something awful happens. Otherwise, they are just a person afflicted with a mental illness. And stigmatizing someone afflicted from a mental health condition, criminal or not, as a lunatic is not only wrong, it is harmful.

Ignorance Causes Harm

Lunatic (or crazy) is not a legal, medical or psychiatric term. It is a leftover slur from an earlier time of lesser understanding.

The CEO of the NRA demonstrated how completely out of touch he is with what mental illness is and what it looks like. For example, would we call someone suffering from depression a lunatic? How about after a school shooting? If the answer is yes, then why didn't we take this person off the street and institutionalize them before such a person commit a mass shooting? If you say depression isn't serious enough, what if the condition was Generalized Anxiety Disorder, ADHD, Bipolar Disorder, or Schizophrenia? Do we civilly commit people because they have a mental health condition? What if they refuse treatment—it is their right—do we civilly commit someone even if they have not committed a crime?

The fact of the matter is that the NIMH estimates that approximately 45 percent of the population suffers from mental illness at some point in their life. At least 26 percent of the population suffers from mental illness in the past year.

This idea that we can suddenly round-up these so-called lunatics and the world would be a safer place is just plain ignorant.

Calling someone who suffers from a mental illness a "lunatic" is not only insensitive and unprofessional it reflects a complete lack of understanding of what it means to be afflicted with a mental illness. Just imagine the shame and regret that a shooter afflicted with a mental illness would feel if they had the treatment and care necessary to appreciate the horror of such actions. Just imagine for a moment that of the many people in America who suffer from a mental illness, for the people who don't have adequate or even any mental health care, if these people receive treatment, they would likely live an otherwise normal life.

A mature conversation on the holes in the mental health system doesn't need to include unprofessional and ignorant terms like lunatic. No one asks to suffer from a mental illness. It is not a choice. Living with mental illness is like living with diabetes or asthma; if you get proper treatment, you can live an otherwise normal life. The idea that there is some way to identify who may walk into a school and suddenly start shooting at children is a false sense of what the face of mental illness looks like.

Let me be absolutely clear, I am not excusing or defending the shooting of children and their school teachers. That was one of the worst atrocities in American history. It has been a tipping point. It made us realize that no one, not even 6- and 7-year-old children, are safe from horrific mass shootings. My point here is that in defending gun rights, NRA CEO LaPierre overattributed blame and demonstrated that he, and consequently the NRA, is completely out of touch with what it means to be suffering from a mental illness and have nothing of value to contribute to the conversation on mental health in America.

Paul Heroux is a state representative-elect for Attleboro. He previously worked for a prison and a jail, and he has a bachelor's in psychology from USC, a master's in criminology from the University of Pennsylvania and a master's in public administration from Harvard. Paul can be reached at paulheroux.mpa@gmail.com.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Jonathan Friedman (Editor) December 28, 2012 at 04:35 PM
The comments section was not working before. Now it is. Sorry for the inconvenience.
George Glass December 28, 2012 at 05:51 PM
I would like a posting of the Meet the Press interview so that appropriate commentary may be made. At first blush I would not have the expecation that the head of the NRA would be an expert on anything BUT guns. Having the expecatation that he would have vast knowlege of the compexities of mental heath is just plain silly. I appreciate you putting mental health and the reform that is necessary in the forfront of this issue. Guns are a seperate issue.
Becca S December 28, 2012 at 08:51 PM
Paul, as a therapist and Attleboro resident, I'm so glad we voted you in. Thank you for addressing this issue.
deb of see-attleboro December 28, 2012 at 09:42 PM
Mental health advocates and gun advocates each have an agenda. As a state rep, do you have any immediate solutions on how to protect the general public from violent crime?
Amy December 29, 2012 at 03:22 AM
We need to look at mental health Issues. However, I would caution any Gvm't involvement. Like everything else the Gvm't touches, it would be a disaster and do nothing but create more bureaucracy, massive cost, regulations and of course, more taxes. State run hospitals were closed due to failed Gvm’t bureaucracy and created a massive homeless problem. Hopefully we’ve learned, throwing money at it doesn’t help. Let’s look to the private sector, those with professional experience in this field for great ideas and innovation! As a side note, Israel Air has never been hijacked and not one school in Israel has ever had a shooting. Maybe we could look at their model to protect our citizens.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »