patching...
Update: Get our newsletter in your inbox every morning. Get connected by signing up here. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
Unknown

Election Day in Seekonk: The Value of Competing Ideas

The Presidential Election in Seekonk was the best voting experience many residents say they ever had.  From parking my car in the high school lot to entering the gymnasium and being checked off on the precinct voter list to marking my ballot, checking out and putting my ballot into the ballot box and returning to my car, it took less than 15 minutes.  I also filled out a survey for the Seekonk Public Library during that time.  This speed in voting occurred despite the fact that Seekonk now has only one polling place for all four precincts and 7340 people cast ballots.  Town Clerk Jan Parker and her assistant Karen McHugh deserve accolades for the excellent job they did.  Working with the Public Works Department, the Schools Building Manager and the Seekonk Police Department, they choreographed and orchestrated a nearly flawless operation.

What was not necessarily apparent was the fact that Selectman Gary Sagar, who challenged the idea of a single polling place, was part of the reason for this success.  He and others expressed concerns about parking, long lines and convenience for the elderly, and advocated for a minimum of two polling places.  These concerns were addressed when the Town Clerk made use of all 61 available voting booths, made extra arrangements for the disabled and had the police direct traffic.  The one-way flow of voters through the gym meant that people arriving to vote were not hindered by those exiting after voting.   The competition of ideas, seen originally as a clash of ideas -- one of which would prevail and the other lose -- generated the best possible outcome.

Fifteen years ago, I heard Sam Radford, a nonviolence trainer from Buffalo, New York, speak to inner city youth in Providence about the constructive value of conflict.  Sam became a convert to nonviolence after nearly dying from a gunshot wound to the head.  Conflict will always exist, he said.  Looked at the right way, it betters us.  The word "compete," he told them, comes from Latin and means to strive together.  In athletic competition, the opponents spur each other to excellence.  They become better athletes as a result of competition.  Sure enough.  I recently looked up the word "compete."  The origin was given as Late Latin, meaning "seek together."  The adjective "competent" was also listed.  When we compete, we become more competent!

Finally, after 15 years, I understood experientially the concept Sam was describing.  The competing ideas of one polling place versus two or more polling places meant that Mrs. Parker outdid her usual excellent performance by effectively addressing concerns that had be raised.

Would that we could always see the benefit of competing ideas rather than fearing or suppressing other points of views.  Would also that we could stop viewing the competition between ideas as win-lose rather than win-win and share the credit and joy of a competition well executed.  If we were to see the real value of competing ideas, we would actively seek out opposing viewpoints knowing that the process of competition produces better results.

Congratulations to Seekonk for a fine example of the value of competing ideas and a truly memorable voting day.  The ease with which voters were able to clear up precinct problems without having to drive to another polling place, the management advantages for the Clerk's office of a single location, and the camaraderie created by bringing the entire community together at one site are all evidence of the wisdom of continuing with one polling place.  It's time to move on to other issues.

deb of see-attleboro

6:23 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Let's give credit when credit is due. Mrs Parker did a great job, as always. But this would not have been the case if the school department did not agree to work around the election by closing school.

Secondly, I decided in advance to park in the back by the cafeteria. I saw many, including one elderly woman with a cane do the same. The main reason why I did so was because I was warned in advance of the survey and all the sales booth that were set up that served to slow the process of getting people out of the parking lot. So kudos goes out to me and lady with cane!:)
And, finally, let's not forget to thank Emcee and all the other's who voted absentee.

I know come hell or high water, most people will get to the polls every 4 years. However, it is the smaller, seemingly insignificant elections that are difficult to motivate people to get out and vote. I believe we had some momentum that Town Hall could have tapped into following the 2006 override and the historic election of 2008. Then came the change and there is no way to tell how many people would have voted in local elections at Martin or North when they dropped their kids off. Or who would have at the library when picking out a book or video. Of course, town hall wouldn't make much difference. But the signs would be out to remind people in four different locations. I don't know about you, but I rarely drive by the high school during the week.

Reply

Amy

7:36 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Everyone tried really hard to make the best of a bad situation while voting at the high school. However, the parking lot at the high school was nothing short of dangerous. This fairy tale senario is laughable. I am still baffled why this town will not spend around $5,000 every 4 years for an additional polling location in the north end. Is it stubborness? It can't be the money. Why is this even an argument? We can find more important things to discuss than spending a few thousand dollars every 4 years can't we? Really? Happy Thanksgiving everybody!

Reply

paul

7:37 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

I saw plenty of confusion at the polls and it all stems from checking in and out by precinct. Two people in front of me put ballots in the wrong precinct box and the line came to a hault because none of the old ladies knew what to do, in the end, nothing was done. With only one polling location, precincts are no longer needed.

Reply

Amy

7:40 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Paul those ladies are very sweet and work their butts off . You lost the argument with that insult!

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul

8:53 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

They are all very nice, old, senior citizens, that's not an insult, just a fact.

Carol Bragg

9:06 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Paul: Your comment about no longer needing precincts is extremely perceptive and definitely needs to be explored. It would save oodles of time in the Town Clerk's office and eliminate voter confusion about what precinct they live in. I hope Mr. Sagar and Mrs. Parker will together consider this option. I assume it would require legislative action at the state level, but it makes ever so much sense. Great idea! Thanks so much for sharing it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

deb of see-attleboro

10:52 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

I don't care how many precincts we have. As long as we have more flexibility to improve voter turn out for ALL elections, I'm all ears.. Early voting, more polling locations, technology etc. If legislative action is required to fix the system, may as well do it right the first time. In the meantime, two or more polls won't break the bank and I don't think it is too much to ask.

paul

9:37 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Thanks Carol, have a nice Thanksgiving!

Reply

Terese Bohaxiu-Dicastiglione

5:49 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

There did seem to be a problem with the street listings posted at the high school showing the wrong precinct in some cases. For the 10 minutes I was there, I saw 2 cases of people being redirected to other precinct tables even though they said they went to the precinct that was listed on the street listing.

Reply

Carol Bragg

8:43 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Terese: You may want to discuss this with the Clerk's office. There were certainly precinct issues, apparently most from people failing to fill out this year's town census (there are always people who don't bother sending it in to report address changes) which is used to update the voters lists. But this is also a case where it's helpful to have one polling place. It means people don't have to drive to another polling place but instead can have the correction made on site.

Reply

Amy

9:27 am on Monday, November 26, 2012

I'm not sure how having one precient instead of 4 will cut lines, cut down on the traffic, make the parking lot safer or save people from having to drive to the opposite end of town to vote.

Reply

Leave a comment