http://conceptualmath.org/philo/taxgrowth.htm

The economy *strengthens* when taxes are raised. It may not be "common sense," but it's true.

Also, federal spending is relatively low now, as a percentage of GDP. It went up under Bush. Why? because Republicans lie to people and get elected claiming to want to lower spending. They don't want to lower spending. They want to shovel federal money into the pockets *they* want, not back into the economy to help the middle class.

http://conceptualmath.org/philo/fed_rcpts.htm

Pretty Please??....Can we go back to the booming days of the early 2000s??....I miss the good old days of Cold Warriors running our defense policy. I miss neoconservative whack jobs running World Bank, being ambassador to the U.N., and being U.S. ambassador to countries we war with.
Bring all the PNAC goons back so we can have a reunion. I'd love to have 3.8 percent of our GDP go toward Defense spending. I miss having our economy doing so well with the policy drafted by the 109th congress. I miss the wonderful atmosphere of our domestic politics back then. And our industrial policy during that time? Oh, how I pine for the Bush/Cheney days! Go Romney!! I can't wait to go live under the Olive street bridge! I got dibs first!!

With another 4 years of President Obama, you will be living under the Olive Street bridge. When Mitt Romney is elected, you will have the chance of the American dream of a good paying job so you can put food on your table and provide for your family on your own without interference and a free handout from the Government.

You sir are absolutely correct about another 4 years of Obama. I totally agree. I was completely against the Dummycrats ram rodding Gotcha politics based legislation through the House and Senate during their short stay in the majority of both. They had their chance to reverse some damage, Bush Tax cuts, lower defense spending to 2000 /2001 levels. Slam the doors on our economic flight, end both wars, prohibit war profitiering. Nope! God forbid the dummycrats had a pragmatic bone in their body, they went straight for the counter punch. Obamacare. As for the American dreams, well, thanks to dummycrats dropping the ball when they had a chance to reverse course, The American dream is either dead and buried, or there is a tag on the American Dream that reads," MADE IN CHINA". So with that I do agree. That's why Obummer does not get my vote. As for Romney: He would never get my vote for anything. I am one of those few weirdos who do not subscribe to any brand of party. Maybe, (as I have said about the Brown/ Warren race) I would vote only for the candidate who backs out of the race first.

Gretchen,
That's not entirely true. U.S. Senator Scott Brown, a Republican voted with Democrats in favor of the veterans jobs bill back in September; however, the veterand jobs bill was deemed as too costly by the Republican leadership, which I can see their point. The veterans jobs bill needs to be re-worked in order to bring the costs down. The Democrats love high costs and high taxes. As President Ronald Reagan once said: Republicans believe everyday is the Fourth of July and the Democrats believe that everyday is April 15th.

Richard, you simply cannot say things that are untrue.
"The democrats love high coasts and high taxes."
That's not fact that's your biased opinion. You don't even
need to think....just spout this tripe.

Ronald Reagan used the 'tax and spend' label and rode
it into the White House. His factoids weren't any truer than yours.
Now we have reliable fact checkers. For once, think before your write
this propaganda. Say something true for once.

Every government going back in history has somehow neglected
to take care of its veterans. They have paid lip service with
speeches and parades singing the praises of veterans and
speaking of the nation's gratitude.

This generation of soldiers, families, communities, voters are NOT
going to let Republicans conveniently 'forget' what we owe our vets.
It's going to be expensive to care for wounded warriors who come
back from the dead with traumatic brain injuries and PTSD. That's not
'tax and spend'--that's holding true to our promise. If the Republican party
tries to weasel out, they will be hugely unpopular.

Gretchen,
It is true that Democrats love high taxes and high costs, just look at Obamacare which is the highest tax increase on the middle class. Also, if the Democrats didn't love high taxes, they wouldn't be crying and whining about increasing taxes for those dreaded 1 percenters who are the job creators.

Our local Republicans such as George Ross and Betty Poirier do all that they can to support and vote for legislation aimed at helping our Veterans.

I have no respect for either of them, shameless political hacks. They are against gay marriage, birth control, abortion, public education, etc.

Richard:
Do you realizes that Paul Heroux's main purpose in running for State Rep., that his whole campaign is to decrease tax waste? He's a fiscally conservative Democrat.

Actually Paul Heroux has a far better chance of eliminating wasteful spending than Ross since he uses evidence-based methods of judging the spending? Does it work? is it effective? Are there ways of doing more with less?

Your tax- and-spend rhetoric is 3 decades old and lost its punch eons ago. It never was true and you know it. Time to rethink your hackneyed arguments. They convince no one and destroy any credibility you might otherwise have.

George Ross is a fiscally conservative Republican and he understands the need to reduce taxes and reduce out of control spending which is why he gets my vote. Paul Heroux is Democrat and will vote 100 percent with the liberals of his party, just like that tax and spend liberal Bill Bowles.

Ok, Hold up a sec! (sore spot) I take nothing from Mr. Ross other than he wants to duke it out with those mental midgets up on Beacon Hill. I get that.
He seems to want to fight for the district. Ross works hard. Gets hit, sucks it up, and drives on. (All I see)
So, I appreciate his service to our district. (For what little I know of his record.)
My dilemma between Bowles and Ross rested on the fact that Bill was accessible. He was open to my questions. Mr. Ross? Never even saw him. Based on my lack of understanding of how Ross operates, I am left with my gut telling me:
"Can't have a state Rep to lock horns up there on beacon hill. Those guys up there are locked in like Legos and act like hyenas! They turn the other way when confronted, only to regroup and retaliate when they hatch a plan to do so, and generally, much to the disregard of others, when carried out. (They have no fortitude to endure any kind of conflict, because they built a pretty little world up there where "NO" is never told to them.) So bully tactics fail." That's my read.
(More to follow...)...

(Continued...)
I went to the Heroux site to poke around a bit, I heard it all before Tax this..waste that..yadda yadda..(Surely someone who wants votes) (and a Dem.) I checked his creds. IDDC, Macro-economics, Justice and corrections system. The case built in his favor. Now when I met Paul Heroux, I was immediately impressed by his personality. I had a short visit during the primaries, He: holding a Heroux sign out by the Elks with a number of his supporters. There was not much political we spoke of, I didn't really feel the need to. I felt pretty comfortable with his direction. I saw a thinker. I saw a feeler. I saw someone who (unlike the '100percent Lib voter', (my sore spot) described by Mr. Lunt.) will utilize his well of knowledge, fed by his many scholarary, professional and personal experiences, coupled by his innately intuitive, "..next step ahead of you.." way of thinking, to out-match the wits of those who may impede his progress to serve his constituents. (Which I believe IS NOT campaign blather from Paul Heroux, but something I feel he deeply cares a lot about, and will do.) As for Mr Ross? Maybe he should open up a bit. Shed some light for others to base their vote. That is my only complaint of Ross.

Oh, and a reason why I am not voting for senate candidates this november:
http://massdems.us2.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=c0111be598bdb0643a7e09c73&id=084234d069&e=581dde18af

This senate race is not for any of us. It's for the party. This disgusts me as an American, a constituent and most importantly (for them) a voter.

The Senate race is indeed for us if the country is to return to an economy of low unemployment, reduced taxes and reduced big government spending. Because of President Obama's socialist policies, this country is in 16 trillion dollars of debt, and 23 million people are unemployed.

you really believe that, don't you, I mean so strongly that you base your life on it.
That's okay. It was for you to figure out.

But you must that other people think differently. Each person has their own right to come to their own understanding. That is the starting point of any true discussion. That, and starting with some common facts, not the propaganda that both parties put out, but mostly it's the Republicans, in my opinion.

"Do you realizes that Paul Heroux's main purpose in running for State Rep., that his whole campaign is to decrease tax waste? He's a fiscally conservative Democrat"...

Um....No such thing in this state. I wish there were some blue dogs around here.

Also I get the feeling he supports the decision to allow the wife killer the sex change....hello that's WASTE!! Seems like a nice guy but what ive read from him before on this site really scares me. what exactly would he cut?? Seems like someone who wants to give hand outs to felons.

JustSaying, you are misinformed on all points. Inform yourself please before you try to speak with authority on something you are woefully ignorant about. Check out his website, for starters, call him and ask him, email him.
Egad, what a wrongheaded smear, or at least it seems like a smear. If you have a brain, please use it. You can't just say what comes into your head.

He was against keeping sex offenders away from the playgrounds and parks our kids play at ..http://attleboro.patch.com/articles/emotions-run-high-over-attleboro-sex-offender-ban-video#comments_list.

He is on the criminals side. Policies he does and would support would just lead to more victims and PS I'm not voting for Ross either. Heroux seems like a nice guy but like I said his beliefs are just scary.

Love the lemming telling me to educate myself....oh well some people only ever see their side as they cant see through the fog they have surrounded themselves in. I've read enough of the lemmings comments on here to know that.

Daniel,
If Paul were to be elected, he'd be a freshman Democrat and the leadership on Beacon Hill which is controlled by the liberal lefties would control how he votes on the issues and besides, he would be unpopular with the Democrat leadership such as the House Speaker and House Majority leader who delegate key committee assignments to State Representatives, if Paul Heroux were to vote against his party on the issues. That's another reason why he shouldn't be elected because the Democrats control everything on Beacon Hill. The corrupt untrustworthy culture on Beacon Hill needs to change and that change starts by re-electing George Ross as our State Representative.

Paul,
If you weren't for the council ordinance and yet not against it, does that mean it didn't
"Pique your interest"?? How could you say that the council ordinance is useless ,yet the ordinance is designed to protect children from sexual predators by banning them from our playgrounds and parks. How is that ordinance considered useless? I think it is just the opposite, it deters these sick individuals from harming children.

Paul,
This is an honest question that needed to be addressed which you have answered based on your own experiences; however, to dismiss the hard work of the members of the City Council who came up with the best solution regarding this issue isn't quite fair. The members of the council did their own in-depth research and didn't take this issue lightly. I watch the council meetings every Tuesday night live on DoubleACS from the comfort of my own home and I do remember watching and listening to your comments and everyone else's comments that night. With that being said, there are some perpertrators who have committed these acts in public such as at a Library, and I do remember reading a newspaper story several years ago of an incident at Emerald Square Mall so it is not out of the ordinary. I do commend your anti-crime efforts though.

Paul simple yes or no....should the tax payers pay for a sex change for a murderer? Should they also foot the bill for his hair removal? Looking for your answer as this gives everyone an idea on what you would consider waste.

You also suggested we should consider seaingl criminal records. That doesn't seem to be in the best interest of the community. I want to be able to know if there is a threat in my neighborhood. I base my conclusion that I'm scared of what your policies would be based on your own writings and I'm entitled to it thank you very much. My belief is that if you go to jail you should be out breaking rocks not having sex changes and watching free cable tv all day.

Paul,
I know Cherie Felos and not only she did she ask you basic questions, Ms. Felos being a good lawyer and having a wealth of knowledge in the area of law, she did extensive research on how many sex offenders and what levels there are in the state as well as here in Attleboro, her basic questions to you at the time were just part of her doing her research before coming up with the best legislation that the Council did. For you to say that the City Council didn't know anything is a mere fallacy on your part because Ms.Felos and her collegues did have knwoledge before they voted on the ordinance.

There are SO many people in this area who are child sexual abuse survivors that it was a volatile issue for the City Council to have tackled. (I know from my work and from personal experience what a hot button this is). May I suggest that we not get into a long wrangle over this.

Ms. Felos is a fine person. She spoke extensively with my husband, Rev. Bill Robinson when she ran for City Council at Large. She earned my respect for the quality of her listening and her willingness to take time with us to explore issues we disagree on. Ms. Felos may have done her homework but I'm not sure 1) how much investigation the other City members did, and 2) how much they were willing to be 'educated' by her.

I think it best, at this point, for all sides to pick a time to discuss this after the election and I would ask you to address other issues that came out of the debate, lest you stir up a controversy that affects voting patterns for Mr. Ross and Mr. Heroux. You do a disservice to sexual abuse survivors and the candidates if you pursue this here.

If you remember, as part of a discussion I had with you on PATCH, I suggested that you and I both go to the Darkness to Light training that was part of the Attleboro Public Library's Big Read program. Did you happen to go to that?? Such a forum is the place for discussion sexual abuse. Also, Ms. Felos might not like her name and reputation bandied about here. Take care how you proceed.

Cherie is a good friend of mine and I worked on both of her City Council campaigns, serving as her campaign manager for her Ward 1 Council race. I doubt that she would mind if I mentioned her in a brief discussion here. I agree though, there are other issues to tackle such as jobs, lower taxes, less spending and who is the best fit to be our State Representative and in my opinion, that's George Ross

it would be appropriate to check with her first before speaking for another person.
She may want to run for office again some time in the future and might then need for you to get her permission to quote her -- in this matter and in the future.
Please, Richard. I am not trying to make partisan points here. In politics, it's best not to assume you know someone's position, even a good friend.

Richard: You can see now in the wake of Hurricane Sandy that there are additional serious issues we must contend with that, if unaddressed, will ruin the economy: large sections of the country are extremely vulnerable to the ravages of ever more destructive storms and we have an out-dated, crumbling infrastructure in much of the nation. How will we approach these problems if government is not involved? The elephant is like a worm to the boy who thinks only of worms: it has a long, worm-like trunk. But that's not the whole story. We need elected officials who can look at the complexity of issues and how they intersect and come up with sensible strategies that may not seem logical when we look only at a piece of the puzzle. If we can save New York City from future devastation by erecting sea barriers that cost $5 to $10 billion, that investment may save tens to hundreds of billions of dollars over the next few decades. Sometimes we have to spend money to save money, even if that seems contradictory.

If our Government spends wisely and not out of control this is an issue that should be addressed although a super storm like Hurricane Sandy comes once every 50 years, I don't see the purpose of spending 10 billion, the spending should come from the individual states, not the Federal Government. If President Obama is re-elected, Government will be too big and taxes will increase accross the board which hurts the economy. We also need a stronger military to thwart terrorism. The Obama administration has also bowed down to China, and we borrowed more than we should have from China which is wrong. Here's another fact, China is manipulating their currency which has meant more U.S jobs being sent to China instead of keeping the jobs here in America and the Obama administration has done nothing to combat the Chinese Government and hold their feet to the fire on this which is a huge mistake. I don't think President Obama deserves re-election, that's not the hope and change that I'm looking for.

yep, you got all the Romney talking points down pat but there's no truth to any of them.
We need a smarter security system "to thwart terrorism" not more soldiers and big expensive hardware. It's a new 'war' and it also includes "the minds and hearts" of the people whose country we invade and occupy. When I say, security, I mean the CIA, NSA, and other services cooperating not running their own fiefdom and not sharing info. (such as might have prevented 9/11).

It is Romney who is "unworthy to be president" and for different reasons, George Ross is likewise "unworthy" for further office.

You may say that Mitt or George are unworthy for office but that's just your opinion Gretchen. Both are fine and upstanding men. After 9/11, the efforts of the Bush administration made coorporation between the security agencies a reality and they all share information today, again, thanks to George Bush. President Clinton cut the military budget which is why our intelligence gathering capabilities were poor. President Obama is doing the same thing as President Clinton by cutting the military budget. Here's another fact: The Obama administration is covering up their mistakes made in Libyia. The administration denied that is was an act of terrorism, instead they blamed it on a YouTube video, how poor is that?? It's very poor, and smacks of appeasing the muslims who killed our U.S Ambassador. Just my opinion though

George Ross is worthy of another term in office Gretchen. He's done alot for this community and continues to work hard doing his job. He's always there for the veterans too, despite what the Heroux supporters may think. The booing at the debate showed how classless, arrogant and disrespectful the Heroux supporters were.

Daniel,
That's your opinion, it's not a fact. What is a fact is that though is that he didn't do anything to the audience, that is just a non-issue and an example of Heroux grasping at straws. What is a fact Daniel is that the booing is an example of the Heroux supporters being arrogant, disrespectful and more important, classless, end of story and I've said enough on this subject. The voters will decide the race on Tuesday.

Rick Lund makes no sense at all and is thankful fpr Freedom of speech. But keep voting the way you do and that right will go away. You fool.

Brian,
Stop drinking the liberal socialist kool aid. If you vote for President Obama, your freedom of speech will go away, and our country will be a socialist country, that's the dream of President Obama and the democrats, where everybody is dependent on the government for everything. Under President Obama, the illegals and those on EBT cards will get everything for free, is this the HOPE AND CHANGE that you want for America?? Voting democrat and re-electing President Obama, you will get it. The liberal kool aid is not good for you Brian and you don't make sense with your posts either but keep voting your way and our country will go down hill.

Brian,
16 trillion dollars in debt, the unemployment rate is 7.9 percent and 23 million Americans are unemployed, half of the country is on some sort of welfare program, we are already in a mess because of President Obama's policies, 4 more years of Obama and we will never recover from his socialist leaning policies. Romney has a vision to restore America to its greatness.

Romney has a vison of becoming Evangelist in Chief, starting wars with Iran, just to throw his weight around, balloon the military budget, destroy : FEMA, the Dept. of Education, Health and Human services, etc. etc. He thinks God at anytime can come down and take care of climate change. He's in the Republican bubble/echo chamber and so are you. Time to face up to the fact that Reality is about to bite you and your kind. Time to learn some hard lessons, that is, if you have the humility to do that....otherwise it will be 4 more years of Republican intransigence and gridlock that ends up harming Americans. Time to wake up.

I saw Romney in clips saying that he wants to do away with FEMA. He said it.
Military, has to adapt to the times not fight yesterday's wars. It needs to do more with less. Sec. of Defense Leon Panetta has been doing that and he's refreshingly honest and forthright, too. He's well liked and effective.
Romney knows as much about the military as he does about foreign policy. He'd call in people like John Bolton to his side. Egad, the return of the Bush Neocons. That's available online too, his cabinet appointments for his first day. The day he destroys the Affordable Care Act even though it's essentially the healthcare plan he started in Mass.
As for Medicare, it's a ploy to tell seniors to 'vote for Mitt' and plan to stiff the next generations. People work hard for a lot of years for their Soc. Security. If we weren't over spending on the military, if we were paying attention to procurement and justifying new weapons, we'd have plenty of money for the generation of school children getting an education, young people going to college not being weighed down for life with extremely high loans. But no! The Right keeps yawping on about Obama cutting the military and the truth is he did not!!!
Vouchers are a scam and you know it. You can't send a voucher check to an 85 year old elder and have him/her choose between different plans. That's just plain wrong. Vouchers are simply a way for the Feds to cheap out on seniors, to cheat them.

"Cable news has created a new generation of blowhards...." who don't know how to tell fact from spin, nonsense and propaganda, who love the hostility and negativity, who exist to keep recycling the old lies. And all it takes to get out of this bubble and to see how venues like Fox News are jerking you around is to THINK.
http://www.alternet.org/media/how-fox-news-created-new-culture-idiots?akid=9644.166498.MPizcq&rd=1&src=newsletter738212&t=8

The Affordable healthcare Act will balloon the federal budget and be a jobs killer for business and will ruin our economy Gretchen, think instead of listening to the liberal spin that the left wackos are planting in your head. Stop watching CNN,NPR and anything liberal, the reality is as I stated earlier is that it's just a fallacy and a lie what the liberals are telling you about Mitt Romney's healthcare plan. Medicare indeed won't be touched for our current seniors, and future generations when they reach retirement age will have a choice of the medicare system as it always has been, or a voucher for you to shop and smartly choose for yourself what type of healthcare you need, not one that the federal government tells you that you can have. The middle class will be paying for Obamacare with a huge tax increase and we will have a system similar to Canada where it will take months if not years just to see a doctor for an ailment. Mitt Romney's healthcare plan is a better option because the individual states will have the option to craft their own plan that is tailored for people who live in the states, not the federal government telling you what type of healthcare plan you must have. I like Mitt Romney's plan also because it will give me the choice of choosing healthcare options between state lines which creates competition among healthcare companies and reduces costs, not big government telling me healthcare I have to buy.

I think Rich should go to the crown jewel of Rep Rosses legacy and throw himself from it.Because we all know he didnt do anything with Bath salts except smoke them.

" I'M DANIEL F. DEVINE & I APPROVED THIS MESSAGE " ~ The 2'nd Bristol District will be much better served when PAUL HEROUX is our STATE REPRESENTATIVE. I advise & urge all my fellow Veterans to vote for him.

Here's a fact regarding President Obama's spending since he's been in office, he's spent more than his predecessors: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704320104575015072822042394.html

That's what the democrats on Beacon Hill are already a one party system ruling everything and the results in Massachusetts have been corruption high taxes and high unemployment, and a system of nepotisim and political hacks.

in your opinion. If Republicans had some decent candidates, we might vote for them. If those candidates were realistic and not ideologues, we'd consider voting for them. Republicans have gone off the cliff with their extremism and their frankly, strange ideology.

What do you consider strange? I don't consider lowering taxes accross the board and being smart with spending as being strange, in fact it's called being fiscally responsible, something the far left members of your party are not.

There is fiscal irresponsibility at all with the Republican party history has proven that time and time again. They are not for the people they are for THOSE people. History has proven that also.

give over Richard. you gave it your all defending your buddy George. Now it's time to accept the choice of the voters. And then come together. Your untruths will vanish into virtual heaven or hell. The election discussion here is over. How will you face tomorrow and the day after that, especially if you don't get your way??

The polls close at 8:00 PM this evening Gretchen, don't count George out. As Yogi Bera said, "It aint over till its over" What will you do when George wins re-election, will you come together??

Gretchen,
I have never spoken any untruths here, only facts, accept it.

So the majority have spoken, the majority obviously want big government, high taxes, lies and corruption both on Beacon Hill and in Washington D.C. Today is not a day to celebrate, we will have more of the same and it will be worse because Obamacare won't be repealed and the middle class will be paying for it. Get ready for a lack of jobs, and more free handouts, and more freeloaders and takers. Yes, the majority have voted for Barack Obama's dream, not the American Dream!!

I think John Boehner agrees with you. He was on TV and suggested to be bipartisian. I hope our newly re-elected President and members of his party takes this to heart. Where is the common ground, I doubt the common ground is on taxes; however, maybe smart spending in needed areas can be common ground issues. I hope both the Republicans and Democrats can work together. The last thing we need is a country that is divided; but that is exactly what we are, a nation that is divided, the election results prove that. I just don't want to see America turn into a socialist nation where everyone is dependent on the government for everything because big government doesn't work, a smaller, smarter government is best and I hope our leaders in Washington and on Beacon Hill on both sides of the aisle see this need.

Now that my anger from the election results have subsided I will say that Congratualations is deserved to all candidates who won yetserday's election. The electoral map of the country shows a very real and disturbing trend. We still are a divided nation split 50/50. The biggest challenge for President Barack Obama, in my opinion is how to bring the nation together if this is even possible. I believe that President Obama, and House Speaker John Boehner must set a serious tone of cooperation and bipartisianship if we are to see real progress. Here on the local level, that bipartisianship must take shape as well. Here's to hoping that members of each party will help to provide real workable, viable solutions to our nation's problems.

Here's an interesting story. Where's the outrage? How about a recount?
http://www.duffelblog.com/2012/11/military-absentee-ballots-delivered-one-day-late-would-have-swung-election-for-romney/

Richard, the article is satire. The Duffel Blog is like the Onion for military information.

The last 3 comments might be the best thing I have ever seen on this site!

I have just found the perfect country for you idiot GOP wingnuts. It is a place with no government to intrude into your lives, no taxes of any kind to create uncertainty for rich guys, no minimum wage, no government mandated healthcare, no regulations to impede business, no laws against outsourcing or importing, no environmentalist movements, no unions, no education, energy and housing departments and as much God as there can be in your life.

Republicans, please move to Somalia!

No government. No taxes of any kind. No regulations. No borders. No money spent on infrastructure. No roads. No water. No schools. No life expectancy. No safety net. No healthcare. No hope. No change. No future.

Welcome to Mogadishu! Will you be staying for long?

I can't believe this idiotic BS Richard the dunce was allowed to post here. I am beginning to believe that academic grad pic was from a "special' school because it sure isn't from any accredited education institution. What a ignorant douchebag!

Facts: President Obama has cut taxes for 97% of Americans

Breakdowns for the USA and MA below:
http://ctj.org/pdf/truthaboutobamataxcuts.pdf - USA
http://www.ctj.org/obamastaxcuts/ma.pdf - MA

In case you want more tax FACTS - THE LINK IS HERE
http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/24/smallbusiness/obama-tax-cuts/index.html

Lunt is wrong and a stupid liar on over taxing

American dream in trouble - hardly
FACTS: 401k hit record high
http://money.cnn.com/2012/11/08/retirement/401k-balances/index.html?iid=Popular

How can that be if the corporations and individuals were in stagnation?

Don't believe bumbling ignorant ideologues like Lunt

FACTS - not idiotic screeds from people mentally challenged like Lunt

http://www.businessinsider.com/politics-economics-facts-charts-2012-6

Reading this opinion pablum makes me wonder if that academic stuff you were wearing was a halloween costume - Did mommie feel sorry that you "weren't like other kids" so she hd to dress you up like you were educated - your opinion piece supports my assessment

I see that Mr. Lunt has made a fool of himself once again. As Abe Lincoln once said: "Better to remain silent & thought a fool than to speak out & remove all doubt"

http://whitepeoplemourningromney.tumblr.com/ - surprised Richard wasn't on this site yet

According to the congressional budget office, the unemployment rate is expected to jump from 7.9% to 9.1%. This is the American Dream that the liberals wackos voted for on Tuesday. Don't say I didn't warn you all of this. You've got what you wanted, now reality sets in.

This makes my case for the extension of the Bush era tax cuts, along with the Obama 2 percentage point payroll tax cut. Cutting the taxes will mean that the GDP (Gross Domestic Product) will grow 2.2 percent next year.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/09/days-after-victory-obama-faces-fiscal-cliff-as-budget-office-warns-recession/

Since the re-election of President Obama here is a list of companies that have announced layoffs due to tax increases and Obamacare. This is the America that the liberals have voted for
:http://www.conservativerefocus.com/blog5.php/2012/11/08/dozens-of-businesses-announce-closings-and-layoffs-due-to-obama-s-re-election-the-list

Here are more companies that have been added to that list: - Atlantic Lottery Corporation
- Welch Allyn
- Dana Holding
- Stryker
- Boston Scientific
- Medtronic
- Smith & Nephew
- Abbott Labs
- Covidien

roughly a month http://www.coachoutletonlineoe.com Coach Factory Outlet
after the http://www.louisvuittonoutletam.net Louis Vuitton Outlet
she received http://www.coachfactoryoutlethn.org Coach Factory Store
a letter http://www.guccibeltsoutletds.net Gucci Belt
reverse mortgage http://www.coachfactoryonlinefn.net Coach Factory Online Store
informing her http://www.coachfactorystorecd.com Coach Factory Outlet
that unless http://www.coachoutletb1.com Coach Factory Online
she paid http://www.coachoutlethcs.com Coach Outlet Online
she would http://www.coachoutletonlinegc.com Coach Online Outlet
lose her home http://www.coachoutletuso.net Coach Factory Outlet Online
in San Bernardino http://www.coachbagsoutletel.com Coach Bags Outlet
the reverse http://www.coachoutletonlineef.org Coach Outlet Online
mortgage deed http://www.coachfactoryonlineen.com Coach Factory Online
she would http://www.coachfactoryoutletion.com Coach Factory Outlet
have virtually http://www.hemesbelscq.com Hermes Belt
no right http://www.coachoutletmls.com Coach Factory Outlet Online

Was the election stolen from Mitt Romney? Did President Obama steal the election?? It certainly looks that way.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/m-was_the_2012_election_stolen.html

Thanks I needed a good laugh. Rick Lunt tonight at the Imrpov.

Where did you go to school Rick? because they didnt teach rational thought or reason. Or if they did you elected not to take these courses.

Brian,
Obviously you don't know what real facts are if you even read the article. There is fact based evidence in the article that suggests, and I mean only suggests that the election was stolen from Mitt Romney, not to say that it did happen; however, the evidence is there. Of course Brian, you and other liberal lefties just dismiss these articles as lies and mistruths and would rather believe what the liberal media hacks tell you.

I just thanked you for the laugh why cant you understand that?

And speaking of Hacks that was a real creditable site. you Hack

This is what will happen if the tax cuts expire. This is what the liberals voted for in the recent election. The moral of the story is tax increases will ruin the economy!

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/11/08/fox-facts-what-is-the-fiscal-cliff/