Tell Us: Nemo or No Nemo?
Some choose to call the pending winter storm Nemo. Others aren't interested.
Whether this pending winter storm is a Storm of the Century or at least something we'll be talking about for the next several days, weeks, months or years—that won't be determined until it finally arrives and after it leaves and we can assess the impact. But when we do talk about it, what will we call it?
The Weather Channel says you should call the storm Nemo, a name that makes most people think of a talking fish or a submarine captain. The cable station that some people consider to be the ultimate authority on all things weather decided that it would name all "noteworthy" winter storms in 2012-13 and every season going forward, just like what is done for hurricanes. Athena was the first Weather Channel-named winter storm. Then came Brutus, followed by Caesar, Draco and Euclid.
"Our goal is to better communicate the threat and the timing of the significant impacts that accompany these events," the Weather Channel's website states. "The fact is, a storm with a name is easier to follow, which will mean fewer surprises and more preparation."
Some media outlets have chosen to use the Weather Channel's names. Others are not interested. The National Weather Service, which the federal government considers to be the ultimate authority on all things weather, has refused to recognize them, as it said in a diplomatically worded statement.
"The National Weather Service has no opinion about private weather enterprise products and services," an official statement released by the NWS in November says. "A winter storm's impact can vary from one location to another, and storms can weaken and redevelop, making it difficult to define where one ends and another begins. While the National Weather Service does not name winter storms, we do rate major winter storms after the fact."
A less-diplomatic statement was released by Joel N. Myers, founder of Accuweather, rival of the Weather Channel.
"In unilaterally deciding to name winter storms, The Weather Channel has confused media spin with science and public safety," Myers said. "We have explored this issue for 20 years and have found that this is not good science and will mislead the public. Winter storms are very different from hurricanes."
So, what do you think? Is Winter Storm Nemo headed your way? Or maybe it's the Blizzard of '13? Share your opinions in the comments section below, vote in our poll and stay safe during these next two days.
Tisiphone
11:09 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013
Nemo is Latin for "no man". Appropriate?
Petra Zahn Swenson
11:43 am on Friday, February 8, 2013
I believe the naming of the storms is in response to insurance coverage, or the lack thereof in "un-named" storms, to be more specific.
Jerry Chase
4:03 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013
Given that these sorts of storms are invaribly over-hyped, and it starting later than expected, I was prepared to name this after the governor, "Daval" . . as in "DUD".
Gretchen Robinson
5:30 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013
Jerry, it should've been called "Nixon"
Jerry Chase
6:12 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013
I cannot agree on that, Gretchen. Actually, I do not favor naming such storms.
Gretchen Robinson
7:44 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013
I shouldn't have been so snarky.
I agree that we don't need named storms.
Especially, Nemo. My grandson really glommed onto
the Finding Nemo movie especially Nemo. Did they
think of the children when they chose Nemo, that
some kids might be upset that a monster storm is
named after a character they identify as plucky
and persevering?
Tisiphone
8:37 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013
Gretchen, it must be generational. What immediately came to my mind was Captain Nemo. Maybe your grandson should read rather than watch.
Gretchen Robinson
8:41 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013
Tizzy,
what makes you think he only watches movies. He's home schooled and reads about 3 hours a day.
Tisiphone
9:18 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013
Well, I thought that he would be familiar with Jules Verne and Capain Nemo. I don't ponder these things much, but I notice that in a generation "20,000 Leagues under the Sea" has been transformed from "kiddie Lit" to "adult fiction". Of course Captain Nemo's socilaist tendancies would make him a dastardly character to some. I dismiss it as 19th century egalitarianism.
An aside. Does anyone know if AOL is turning a profit with "The Patch"?