Scott Brown Will Not Run for U.S. Senate
Who do you think should be the Republican candidate?
Scott Brown ended speculation Friday afternoon as to whether he would run for U.S. Senate, announcing that he is not entering the race for the seat left vacant by John Kerry’s confirmation to the post of Secretary of State.
Two Democratic political opponents – Congressman Stephen Lynch (D-South Boston) and Congressman Edward Markey (D-Malden) – will face off in the April 30 primary with the special election set for June 25. There are currently no Republican candidates in the race.
Markey, who represents the 5th Congressional District, kicked off his campaign in December. Lynch launched his bid with a formal announcement Thursday afternoon. Lynch represents the 8th Congressional District.
With Brown out of the running, what Republican would you like to see run for the seat? Leave your thoughts in the comment field below.
Dick Armour
2:24 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
There probably should not be another republican senator from Massachusetts, at least until a candidate is not obliged to take the "no new taxes" pledge. It just seems treasonous that a party demands higher loyalty to itself and its ideology than to the country.
Brandy G.
12:32 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013
"It just seems treasonous that a party demands higher loyalty to itself and its ideology than to the country."
I fully agree.
deb of see-attleboro
2:26 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
YES!!!!! Oops. Sorry.
I have no suggestions. But a great big TY goes out to Scott Brown for stepping aside.
Steve
2:51 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
too bad. I was actually looking forward to a Lynch vs Brown election. Either way we would have won because they are both great candidates!!
Ken Tenglin
3:13 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
It doesn't matter who runs as the Republican candidate because most people in this state can't vote for a candidate based on his or her qualifications. They just vote Dumbocrate.
Dennis Naughton
10:34 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
@KEn: Wow Ken. Such insight. Clearly you are smarter than most people.
Brandy G.
12:34 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013
Did I imagine Mitt Romney as our governor for four years? Or Brown himself as a Senator for three?
John L
3:26 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
What? There aren't any available Kennedys to run for Senate, what's this state coming to!!! It really doesn't matter anyway, people here and in the country just vote the party not the person, qualifications or experience ie: Obama
Emcee of Seekonk
4:16 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
I think they tried to entice Ted Kennedy's oldest son, but he lives out of state. Plus, he wasn't interested in the job. Why work that hard when you don't have to.
Dennis Naughton
10:36 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
HaHaHaHa! Keep suckin' on those sour grapes.
paul
3:35 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
Was Scott Brown a Republican? I thought he was a Tea Party, Independent, Wasp etc.
deb of see-attleboro
3:37 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
He was a RINO.
Jerry Chase
4:19 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013
I AGAIN OBJECT TO "PAUL's" USE OF THE PERJORATIVE TERM, "WASP".
Frankly, Paul, I had expected better from you. Are you going to disappoint again??
In Dog We Trust
3:46 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
takes one to know one
Emcee of Seekonk
4:21 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
I liked Scott Brown, but I'll vote for any Republican who runs. Chances are, however, that Massachusetts will pick some Democrat dimwit or other, there's plenty to choose from. Makes no difference at this point.
Dennis Naughton
10:37 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
HaHaHaHa! Keep suckin' on those sour grapes.
Richard W. Lunt
4:27 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
I respect Scott Brown's decision not to run in the Senate race even though he would have won had he decided to run. I'm hoping that he runs for Governor of Massachusetts in 2014. As for who would be a good Republican candidate for U.S.Senate, here are my top three picks. 1. Bill Weld 2. Charlie Baker 3. Andrew Card, former Chief of Staff to President George W. Bush, and also a native of Holbrook, MA.
Emcee of Seekonk
4:43 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
"...1. Bill Weld 2. Charlie Baker 3. Andrew Card ..."
There ya go. I've voted for Charlie Baker before, but I'd like to see him as governor. We must be due for a Republican governor by now.
Dennis Naughton
10:39 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
@Richard: Charlie Baker has taken a job out of state.; Bill Weld is trying a real job for the first time in a long time, though he was good on LGBT issues; Andy Card is retired.
paul
4:56 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
If you throw Bill Weld into the mix you might as well dig up Jane Swift. You Republicans are almost extinct in New England. It's a waste of money for a Republican right wing fanatic to run in Massachusetts, get over it.
Emcee of Seekonk
5:10 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
Jane Swift... gee, I'd almost forgotten about her. She must have a bunch of kids by now, I doubt that she'd be interested... her living out there in Adams, MA or whatever.
Then there's Kerry Healey, she'd make a good candidate for something. But, then Democrats might not like because she's too tall.
Amy
8:28 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
We're here when you need us Paul. We voted to get rid of Obamascare! Oh! sorry, it was shoved down our throats anyway and it passed like a kidney stone before they would tell us how horrible it was.
Janet Sroczynski
5:16 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
Scott Brown for Governor of Massachusetts does have a nice ring to it!
I have enjoyed many of your posts Richard W. Lunt.......so keep them coming!
Dennis Naughton
10:43 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
Gaill Huff is on record as prodding Scottie to get a job and make some money before they are all forced to rely on "socialist" Social Security--like Ayn Rand had to do.
Anonymous
5:27 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
Just because the majority of the Massachusetts population votes Democratic does not mean that they are "Dumbocrats." In fact, Massachusetts was recently proven to be the most educated state in the union (and that is due in fact to both Democrats and Republicans, I might add). Did anyone ever pause to think that perhaps we vote Democrat because that is who we believe to be the most qualified candidate for the election? The majority of Bay Staters align themselves with more liberal beliefs, and thus, we elect those who closely mirror the same. That does not mean we just vote for Democrats just because there is a "D" next to their name on the ballot.
Ken B.
9:57 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013
Being "educated" does not necessarily make one smart
Particularly with the "educational establishment" spawning ultra-left liberalism.
Emcee of Seekonk
5:39 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
"That does not mean we just vote for Democrats just because there is a "D" next to their name on the ballot."
Hmmm. Ya know, I think I've got a bridge I'd like to sell ya.
Anonymous
6:02 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
So, do you mean to tell me that the only educated choice in the upcoming election is to vote Republican? Massachusetts is a liberal minded state, and will vote otherwise. If you believe otherwise, then I have a bridge that I'd like to sell you.
Dennis Naughton
10:44 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
@Emessy: Why don't you sell it to Ken B. He's not educated.
Ken B.
10:41 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013
Dennis, If you are so well educated, why are you so stupid ?
Richard W. Lunt
5:51 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
Here's my surprise Republican candidate pick to run for U.S. Senate: Mitt Romney
Dennis Naughton
10:53 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
@Richard: First we had better find out is his state of residence, since he seems confused himself. The choices are: California (La Jolla mansion), New Hampshire (Lake Winnipesaukee mansion), Massachusetts (does he still own something in Belmont?) , Utah or Michigan? Get back to us on that, will you.
Diane Seavey
11:03 am on Saturday, April 13, 2013
I can think of 47 reasons why Romney would lose.
Amy
8:24 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
Who will we blame now?
Ken B.
9:14 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
Weld will run.
Dennis Naughton
10:53 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
No he won't.
BH
1:53 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013
Does it matter either way? Rich will benefit or poor will benefit. How many of YOU reading this comment right now are middle class? Good luck to us either way.
paul
5:49 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013
The middle class has been gone since 1988 when George H. W. Bush said his famous first words "read my lips, no new taxes". How many of you Republicans can recall that lie? It's not the rich that will benefit the poor, it's the working class. Work is taxed way more than wealth, just ask Mitt Romney.
Trot Nixon
9:17 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013
The GOP in this state is a joke. Bill Weld? The guy hasn't been in the state in over 15 years. Baker? The guy who lost to Deval in which everyone thought the incumbent would lose and ends up getting more votes than any other incumbent gov in history of mass. And whoever mentioned Mitt Romney or any other romney must be high...the guy lost his "home" state in a national election by 20 points. The party needs to stop running the same recycled candidates.
Emcee of Seekonk
9:24 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013
The GOP in this state might be struggling, but it is not in many other states, like TX for example. Massachusetts is such a Mini-Me in comparison.
Richard W. Lunt
4:06 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
Mitt would be a great U.S.Senator for Massachusetts. He has name recognition from his Presidential campaigns, he has experience being Governor of Massachusetts and under his leadership, people in Massachusetts were employed and had good paying jobs. Mr. Romney balanced the budget all four years that he was Governor. Mitt Romney's experience is needed in Washington. How many people can say that congress, the senate and President Obama have balanced a budget?? There hasn't been a balanced budget since the administration of George W. Bush.
Dennis Naughton
10:55 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
....and they would if they had anyone else.
Katydid
8:00 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
Great choice. Mitt was so under appreciated as a governor and candidate for president.
Greg McMillan
9:34 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
What a sad statement about massachusetts voters who can't figure out that a man like Scott Brown can break thru the thick cloud of ignorance spewed by the robotic democratic voters. No one is perfect folks! What's the point of Scott Brown going to washington to bang his head against the wall as he tries to do what's right for the country! If he doesn't fit the job than we deserve what we get....which is very little!
Dennis Naughton
11:01 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
Must be hard for you Republicans to live in the state with the best public education in the country (thanks to Democrats), as has been proven year after year. And then there are those pesky world class colleges and universities who graduate so many thinking people who aren't fooled by the national Republican propaganda mill or Foxtoxica. Yah! What a bunch of dummies those voters are! We deserve what we get! HaHaHaHa! Keep suckin' on those sour grapes.
paul
6:20 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013
Dennis Naughton, you said it all, only leaving out that we have the best hospitals in the world right here in Boston Massachusetts, the bluest state in New England.
Emcee of Seekonk
11:52 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013
"...the bluest state in New England."
There would be a toss up for bluest between Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Vermont. You know, the real up-and-coming states that'll make an impact on the future.
Dennis Naughton
1:02 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013
@Emcee: The English grammar rule when comparing more than two things is to say "among."Between" applies to the comparison of two things.
Janet Sroczynski
4:14 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013
Kerry Healey.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerry_Healey
Dennis Naughton
4:33 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013
Kerry Healey is known for having been the front person to push Republican Jane Swift out of the race for governor in favor of Mitt Romney. By engineering the elimination of Swift, Healey secured the slot of Lieutenant Governor for herself. As per JS's wikipedia suggestion: " Soon after beginning her term as Chairwoman, the Massachusetts GOP began courting Mitt Romney – then the President and CEO of the 2002 Winter Olympics – to take over acting-Governor Jane Swift’s position as the Republican candidate in the upcoming gubernatorial election.[11] Healey discreetly flew to Salt Lake to meet with Romney and, soon after the Olympics, Romney expressed his intention to challenge Swift in a Republican primary.[12] After Swift exited the race, Romney endorsed Healey in her primary race for lieutenant governor against former U.S. Senate candidate and former party chairman James Rappaport, ultimately winning by a thirty point margin.[13] The Romney-Healey team was ultimately successful, and Healey was elected lieutenant governor on November 5, 2002.[14]" In other words, Healey sold out another Republican woman for her own personal benefit. We don't need any candidate with that kind of icy character flaw.
Ken B.
11:00 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013
Right. We need a candidate who misrepresents herself as something she isn't, benefits from it at the expense of others, and then when called out on it, has people like you to defend her and call her accusers "racist"....did I leave anything out ?
Janet Sroczynski
8:02 am on Monday, February 4, 2013
The ol' windbag came out of his bunker I see, and once again does not have much to say.
Emcee of Seekonk
8:09 am on Monday, February 4, 2013
He was going at it full throttle, though. Something must have annoyed him, poor Mr. Nothing.
Emcee of Seekonk
11:31 am on Monday, February 4, 2013
"Tagg Romney, the son of Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, is reportedly considering a run for the open U.S. Senate seat in Massachusetts." ...
Fox News
I hope he does run. Plenty of money behind him and name recognition.
Dennis Naughton
11:54 am on Monday, February 4, 2013
Wasn't Tagg the "brains" behind Mitt's failed campaign?
Emcee of Seekonk
12:27 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013
I doubt it, but, of course, I didn't expect you to approve of him. But, before you get all hyper about it, this is the latest news: "'Two sources close to both Tagg and his father Mitt tell ABC News it’s not going to happen. ... “I think Tagg would be a great candidate,” a source close to both Romneys said. “He grew tremendously in the campaign, but with his company it’s unlikely he can afford to walk away from it right now, sadly.”'
Maybe next time, Tagg.
Ken Tenglin
1:48 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013
@Dennis Were you the "brains" behind Al Gore. I bet your the only one missing Current TV.
Dennis Naughton
5:06 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013
@Ken: Correct English usage is "I bet you're the only one...."
"You're" is a contraction of "you are." Example: You're the driver.
"Your" refers to possession. Example: Your house is larger than hers.
Hope that helps.
Ken Tenglin
7:31 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
My mistake. I bet you're the life of the party. Like that? I bet your brains are south of your navel. Like that? Thanks for the correction.
Charles DiPompo
2:17 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Scott Brown--Governor? Senator? Easy choice. He would have to work hard if he went back to the Senate to try to convince the people of Massachusetts he's an "independent." He's about as Republican as you can get. I wonder who picked up the tab at his lunch date with Karl Rowe during the Republican National Convention.
As Governor, he would have all those jobs and contracts for his friends and contributors. How can he resist that? He got $1,000,000 for his book. Did he donate any of this money to help people in need? Politics has been very, very good to him. And as Governor, it can continue. Plus, as "Governor" that title feeds into his huge ego.
Ken B.
11:16 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Yep, Brown's a Republican all right. Wouldn't take the stage at the convention, wouldn't endorse his party's standard bearer, and ran away from saying he was one when questioned by a TV reporter. Don't bother with the fork, Brown's pop-up "done" indicator has already done its job.
Ken B.
11:18 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
What's going to be hilarious is to see you, Dennis, paul, et. al, start drooling when Brown changes to "D"
Amy
2:54 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Charles thanks for the chuckle. Must we review the double standards again? Did Obama donate anything from his book to people in need? Or from his Nobel peace prize (that one still cracks me up). I wonder who picked up his lunch tab wtih Bill Ayers. Scott Brown is as liberal as you can get. That's why he was elected in Massachusetts but mostly to stop the Socialist takeover of healthcare.
Dennis Naughton
3:11 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
@Amy: Why don't you share with us your understanding of what "liberal" and "socialist" mean.
Amy
3:19 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Sure Dennis, Liberal- a person that is uneducated in politics, economics and how the real world works. Socialist-The government is in charge of all food, the government in charge of banks, the government in charge of energy the government is in charge of health care.
Dennis Naughton
8:41 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013
so predictable--the self-admitted "world according to Amy." As is the case with so many people on the right, you never let the facts get in the way of your preconceptions.
Charles DiPompo
5:05 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Amy, time for any chuckle I hope.
Given your definition of "socialist," you would have to agree that Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are "socialist" programs. Since I am sure you are not a "socialist," are you willing to sign a legally enforceable document refusing to accept Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid? Just think, if you did, you would be helping to lower the national debt, that is unless the Republicians use that savings to increase military spending.
Amy
8:46 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013
Charles, all the programs you mentioned are going to go by the wayside if we don't do something about it. Can we all agree on that? Now, why don't you and your like minded friends all write a big fat check to the Gvm't. You seem to think they are better at running your life than you are. If you watch the news Obama now wants to put the spending back into the military that he fought to keep out last month. More drones?
Jerry Chase
4:26 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013
Dan Winslow for the U. S. Senate!
Dennis Naughton
7:03 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013
Who's that?
Ken B.
8:22 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
.......like I said above......