patching...
Update: Get our newsletter in your inbox every morning. Get connected by signing up here. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Seekonk School District Wants $127K for Security

The funding would be for the first phase of a three-phase plan to make the schools safer.

 

Town Meeting on Feb. 25 will determine whether the Seekonk school district should receive $127,009 to begin a three-phase plan to improve security at the local schools. The school committee voted 4-0 Monday to support the funding.

School Committee Chair Mitch Vieira said the funding would cover the first phase, which is "mainly to allow the police and fire individuals who are in the building to communicate freely and not hit any cellular drop zones or radio drop zones while they are in the building."

Vieira said a private consultant did a security audit of the Seekonk schools shortly after the deadly mass shooting at Sandy Hook School in Connecticut. The audit combined with discussions among leaders of the school, police and fire departments led to the creation of the three-phase plan. The other phases, for which the school district will ask to be funded at a later time will cover "enhancing our access control and surveillance monitoring" and "safety reconstruction, including some physical structure changes," Vieira told Seekonk Patch after the meeting.

During Town Meeting, school district officials will make a presentation focusing on phase one, but it will also include information on the other phases, Vieira said.

School Committee member Brian Freitas said during the meeting Monday that paying for security measures was a necessary expenditure.

"Our request for money here is by no means a knee-jerk reaction to the unfortunate and tragic events at Sandy Hook late last year," he said. "This is a well-thought-out, well-planned process … to make our schools the safest buildings that they can be."

Interim Superintendent Arlene Bosco wrote in an email to Patch that she has received many questions about this issue since Monday. Because of this, she issued a statement to the media:

The recent tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School is a sobering reminder that schools must be vigilant regarding the safety and well-being of students and staff. As with most school systems, it is timely that we review our current safety and security systems and protocols. Seekonk Public Schools has been diligent in this process and this was confirmed by results gleaned from a recent security audit.

Since most security measures span a wide continuum, we have prioritized a list of suggestions to expand our existing security measures. This process will be ongoing and closely coordinated with the police and fire departments.

At the request of the district, the Seekonk School Committee has recommended that the communication capabilities be aligned with recommendations from a recent Communications Audit conducted by both the Seekonk Police Department and the school department. At the town meeting on February 25, 2013, the district will request that monies be allocated for this purpose.

Related Topics: Sandy Hook Elementary School, Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting, School Security, and Seekonk School Department

deb of see-attleboro

8:53 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Who can say "no"?
The only concern I have is that this gets lobbed into the school dept operating budget and becomes the starting point for next years budget negotiations.

Reply

Amy

9:03 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

I have no problem with policemen or security guards guarding the schools, or improving communication capabilities. Now we need $127,009 to “begin” a three-phase plan. This is from a “private consultant”. Is this “private consultant from Seekonk? Has this person been paid? Is the private consultant familiar with the town? I hope the moonbats won’t start with the usual rhetoric, if we don’t spend a bazillion dollars on private consultants, three phase plans and structure changes to all schools in Seekonk then we hate our kids and don’t want them protected. What I want is a common a sense discussion about this and no further exploitation of a horrible tragedy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Wendy Wagner

9:27 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

I'm what you would call a "moonbat," and my first reaction is that this is "security theater." I'm actually not very comfortable with the idea of police patrolling our schools. (An aside: the police in Seekonk aren't the issue; it's more of a general feeling about police patrolling schools.) I'd rather money be spent on teachers and educational opportunities. Police and security guards do great work, but overall, I'd like to see them working more on where there *are* crimes rather than where there *might be* (maybe on the off-chance someone has a psychotic break) a crime. There are real crimes happening in Seekonk every day--people stealing, people being violent with other people they know, traffic violations that put people and property in danger. Why do we need to spend money on the very unlikely chance that someone in or near Seekonk might be psychotic and try to shoot 20 kids?

Comment_arrow

Amy

10:22 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Wendy, I agree with you. (Wow, maybe there's hope for common ground after all). You made an excellent point. I would rather have the focus on where crimes happen not where they might happen. I dont like the idea of armed guards at schools either. If there was a real solution on how to stop it from ever happening again I'd be in 100%.

Comment_arrow

deb of see-attleboro

10:39 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Wendy: I think all the crimes you listed DO happen in schools.
Just because they are happening in the hallowed halls of a government school or parking lot, doesn't make them any less a crime. Or maybe you subscribe to that old adage "It's only a crime if you get caught." Or in the case of the schools, it's only a crime if it is reported to the proper authorities.

However, I agree that the safety of ALL citizens and visitors should be considered equally in any post Sandy hook, Aurora planning. We may need to build a bigger, more sophisticated Seekonk Police Dept. to meet the demands of an ever growing violent culture.
To that end, schools may need to trim their budgets and/or re-institute fees to meet the growing demands of school security, no matter how they choose to handle the crisis.

Comment_arrow

Todd Ouellet

1:03 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Amy I agree. Interesting that my negative post about Carol Bragg keep geeting deleted.
Contact me. We need to be heard

Comment_arrow

Todd Ouellet

10:00 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Yes amy. Maybe we need to organize. I have put out my number and email

Todd Ouellet
PcExpress
508 369 0525
team2aseekonk@gmail.com

Patch_comments_icon

Jonathan Friedman

9:07 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Amy, I'm on your side that the information right now is vague. The good thing is that a presentation will be made prior to the vote at Town Meeting, and at Town Meeting people are allowed to ask as many questions as they want.

Reply

Dave Abbott

10:06 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Ok…before the train completely runs off of the rail. Current communications issues are being addressed in phase one because during testing there were several instances where communication could not be established. Prevention is certainly part of the ongoing planning, but the primary concern to get the process moving forward is the ability to communicate inside the buildings during a crisis.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Wendy Wagner

5:44 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I don't think the communications part was in the original article I read (or I could have missed it), but I would agree that good communications is crucial in any crisis response and that the need for such would be a great investment and its use would extend beyond a shooting situation to almost any kind of crisis. Thanks for clarifying and putting my mind at ease.

Irv Zisman

10:54 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Wendy> "Why do we need to spend money on the very unlikely chance that someone in or near Seekonk might be psychotic and try to shoot 20 kids?" <<< With this comment - you are kidding, right? I'm sure it seemed very unlikely in CT - then it happened...

Also, for your comment of (the police) "working more on where there *are* crimes rather than where there *might be*" <<< I didn't realize Seekonk was a hotbed for criminal activity. I'm guessing you mean having the PD patrol the Best Buy plaza more often on the lookout for someone ripping off an XBox game is more important...

Wake-up to the times...

Bottom line - there is nothing wrong with well-thought/legitimate spending of money on communications infrastructure, and having a town officer on-hand that the staff and students can depend on.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Amy

11:22 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Irv, where does the "legitimate spending" end? It doesn’t. Next we'll need to restructure sr. centers, fire dept's, police depts, bus stations, town hall etc. If the nut in CT was forced into a mental hospital like he should have been things would be different. Instead, everyone else has to change the way we live our daily lives. So many what if's. What if you hit someone on a dark road becasue we have no street lights? Would we get street lights back? NO. It's not a big enough tradegy to exploit.

Dave Abbott

12:56 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Just a clarification for those who may be interested in facts getting in the way, full time guards are not in the proposal.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Amy

8:09 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Dave what is meant by restructure? I'm assuming all schools need to be restructured? Does that include North school? We still own that correct? What about Bristol Aggie? Is that included? I'm just asking. It's not meant to be sarcastic. I know it reads that way.
Thank you.

Carol Bragg

2:55 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

I hope this is only a temporary stop-gap measure. We can protect children in the schools, but they can be shot at shopping malls, movie theaters and in other venues. When they get older, many of the girls/women will be raped or victims of domestic violence. My cousin, a young man, was shot and killed at a gas station when re-fueling his car. There are also, as we've just experienced, workplace shootings.

The long-term solution is to move away from a culture of violence. We reward aggression in this country. There are, however, peaceful societies. Many children are sadly not learning values and alternatives to violence at home or in faith communities. The only practical solution is to make such education part of our public school system. Nonviolence education is taking place in many of Worcester's schools. Seekonk should consider doing the same. Who knows? Maybe it would even have an impact on town politics if children learn reverence for life, self-esteem, respect for others, nonviolent communication skills, conflict resolution and mediation, and looking for win-win solutions.

Reply

Irv Zisman

12:56 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

An accident on a dark road is a tragedy - but it is also an accident.

While a new street light would be nice - common sense says to make an effort to drive a little safer/slower. An accident may happen regardless - but as a driver you make a conscious effort...

Deciding to lock and load on a school full of kids is not an accident - i think anyone with a heart can agree that practicing safety is needed as well. And yes - things don't come free - it includes spending.

We live in a different world today - which means different types of planning and spending than what we have all considered the norm. And yes, we continue to have to live our daily lives a little different while we move forward - it's part of putting on your pants in the morning.

Sweeping it under the carpet and saying - what's next - now we'd have to restructure this and that... not the right thinking. For better or worse, as times change - so do the overall needs of an organized society.

Do we need better mental healthcare? Yes. Should the nut have been locked-up? Yes. But that isn't 100% of the solution - just like we can't light every street light - we can't find every nut on the street.

And... I still think it is sad to think and say >>> "Why do we need to spend money on the very unlikely chance that someone in or near Seekonk might be psychotic and try to shoot 20 kids?" << again << unlikely? Every shooting was unlikely to all of those involved...

Reply

deb of see-attleboro

12:58 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Something needs to be said.

In the past Seekonk Schools have been very proactive with innovative programs to create a culture of non-violence, conflict resolution etc.

In the early eighties, Dr Hurley and colleagues led the charge with the eighth grade camping trip. It was a working vacation, so to speak.

The gay straight alliance has been at the high school for well over a decade. Perhaps the program has morphed into something else. But I think it still exists. Don't underestimate Seekonk.

Yet, there is a pervasive, inescapable culture of violence. What to do about it, I don't know. The best we can do for now is to ask for the best defense.

Reply

Todd Ouellet

1:02 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Carol, as always your mouth is bigger than your logic. Please list for us these "peaceful societies" Please, then we can model ourselves after them!!!!

Reply

Todd Ouellet

1:02 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Maybe Eygypt or Iran or most of Africa, I heard Greece used to be nice. And no one ever gets rapped in India. Nice places. Please give us the list of utopias so we can begin to transform ourselves. And I would also like the town to give more details of this audit done by "Whom???" i agreee with spending money on making the schools safer but lets be sure we are hiring the correct people to access. My God, we had enough trouble hiring engineers for civil projects in this town. Stand up seekonk and say something!

Reply

Todd Ouellet

1:08 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I find it interesting that several negative comments about Carol Bragg and her input on these blogs do not get approved by moderators. Carol is in every blog and is alway right! Hmmm? But I'll try one more entry. Carol, Please list these utopias that we can use as a model for a peaceful society. India?? Eygypt? Greece was nice before they went bust! No violence in china or Korea (north or south). The society you suggest only exist early in the morning on PBS networks and was meant for children. Did you think the TeleTubbies were Real? Come on Carol. Please be realistic.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Jonathan Friedman

1:14 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

No need to start conspiracy theories. We may have an issue with our comments section program. I am working with the tech team to figure out what may be wrong.

deb of see-attleboro

12:56 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Jonathan: I have a comment "pending approval" which was submitted yesterday at 4:29pm. Should I resubmit?

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Jonathan Friedman

12:58 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I think there might be an issue with our commenting program, I will let you know.

Reply

Emcee of Seekonk

1:37 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Animals are territorial and I don't think they can be talked out of it... hence, there are no utopias that I can't think of. For a minute, I thought of the Eskimos, but I think they are tribal when necessary to protect their food supply.

As for security funding... it's $127k for the first phase or three phases. I wonder what the rest will cost, and if all this is a one-time cost for upgrading the security of four buildings. Will Seekonk have to divert funds from other projects because we do have just so much money available to us.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carol Bragg

3:10 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Emcee: Take a look at the website killology.com, created by Lt. Col. David Grossman, a former Army Ranger and psychology professor at West Point. He has done extensive study about killing. There are many fascinating articles, including one pointing out that it's not natural for animals to kill others of their own species -- they fight and butt, but don't kill. The military discovered that during World War II, the natural inhibition against killing other human beings meant that only 15-20% of soldiers would actually aim their weapons to kill. The military has, through training, upped that figure to 90%. Grossman also talks about what's behind the school shootings and concludes that we are teaching children violence through television, video games, and the media. We'll never be successful in legislating a prohibition on violence in the media because it would be unconstitutional. And these huge industries are unlikely any time soon to forfeit huge profits and shift to less violent entertainment. I view widespread nonviolence education as the only logical way of creating children (and later adults) who are resistant themselves to resorting to violence and also know how to use nonviolence to challenge injustice. For starters with peaceful societies, go to peacefulsocieties.org. If we can, through training, desensitize people to taking lives, we can also, through training, resensitize people to valuing human life -- their own and others.

Comment_arrow

Todd Ouellet

6:39 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Emcee, those are the questions. IT seem nobody has the answers. Most likely a tax increase for the funding. I am ok with the spending as long as its done effectively. Our selectmen tend to use our tax money like monopoly money. But what do you expect with at leaset one of them has his car registered in NH to avoid taxes here. Hmmmmm?

Stephanie

2:08 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I am upset. I have 2 children in the Seekonk schools and worry about them like any parent. I want our schools to be safer, but we should know exactly how this money is being spent. From what little I got from this article it seems as though $127,009 is going to nothing unless a tragedy hits. So if a tragedy hits, the emergency services can communicate within the building. Shouldn't it be the police & fire department's responsibility to have the technology that they need no matter what building they are in? I feel it should be our first priority to prevent rather than gear up for a tragedy. Gearing up should be left for after schools are safer. Nowhere in this article does it say that the money for phase 1 is going to anything that is preventive. We should know who this company is that did the audit & who is doing the work. Why is this the first we are hearing about these plans? My husband works in food transport & is always let into a back door of every school by someone who has never met him before. Shouldn't we be focusing on all the ways our schools are not safe and how to fix that instead of what to do when something bad happens. Let’s stop bad from happening not getting ready for it to hit!

Reply

Dave Abbott

2:50 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Please keep in mind that the upcoming town meeting is a special town meeting due to the senior center. The additional phases are being planned for our regular town meeting in June. Those phases deal with physical improvements and access control, which would be accomplished while school was out for the summer. This is all tentative based on how long it takes to put everything together and depending on what is approved. To be clear, the town and police department are very much involved in this process and much of the planning is based on their direction.

I am working on what information can and cannot be released. The warrant article for phase one was just completed Monday night, so there is much work to be done prior to town meeting.

A reminder that I am providing information but these are my views and do not represent the views of the school committee.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carol Bragg

3:27 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Dave: I should add that I do not oppose this expenditure of funds. I just don't see it as a long-term answer to the problem of violence in this country. We've let things slide and have been reactive. We need to become proactive and teach children (future adults) that there are more effective ways of belonging to the community than through bullying, name-calling, physical fights or use of weapons.

Comment_arrow

deb of see-attleboro

3:34 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Again, Carol Seekonk has been doing what you suggest for decades.

Comment_arrow

deb of see-attleboro

3:36 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

But that was before world-wide net and intimate social networking. It is a "brave new world".

Comment_arrow

Todd Ouellet

9:24 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Dave, the phrase, "can not be released", should not exist when the information is funded by the town and directly effects the town. And the work done prior to the meeting should be open to public review and scrutiny!

Carol Bragg

3:52 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

A comprehensive nonviolence curriculum has not been available that long. For a good discussion, see Nonviolence or Nonexistence? King's daughter: Message is as vital as ever -- http://thetandd.com/news/topnews/nonviolence-or-nonexistence-king-s-daughter-message-is-as-vital/article_887ef206-60f7-11e2-a8dc-0019bb2963f4.html

Reply

deb of see-attleboro

4:09 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Carol: I don't think we need a nonviolence curriculum. I think what is needed is a code of conduct that demands non-niolence.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Wendy Wagner

5:47 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

What do you mean by "code of conduct," and who would enforce such a code?

Comment_arrow

deb of see-attleboro

5:59 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Teachers and administrators should enforce a "code of conduct'. Do I really have to spell out what is acceptable in a work or learning environment?

Comment_arrow

Wendy Wagner

9:10 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Deb, I think you and Carol are not talking about the same thing at all.

Comment_arrow

Wendy Wagner

9:12 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Actually, I can clarify what I mean. A code of conduct governs the behavior of children in the school until the day they graduate. A non-violence curriculum would, I assume, be part of education for life beyond graduation day.

Patch_comments_icon

Jonathan Friedman

5:58 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

For clarification regarding one of the comments posted above, nothing in this article was changed from the original version except for a few grammar fixes. If any significant information is changed or added to an article, I always note that either in the article or in the comments section.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Amy

8:11 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

It's a very good article Jonathan, thank you for keeping us informed.

Comment_arrow

Wendy Wagner

9:09 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Was that my comment? I take responsibility for my mistake in not reading it (or processing what I was reading) all the way through. :)

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Jonathan Friedman

9:11 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Not a problem at all, Wendy. And thanks for the compliment, Amy. I just wanted to clarify how we make corrections on this website.

Todd Ouellet

6:28 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Stephanie, Good points. Please give us the details of this Independent agency that did this security audit. Is it the same company we are going to contract to do the suggested work?

Reply

Amy

7:58 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Another suggestion to prevent this from happening here in our own little private Idaho; if you have a person with mental "issues" living with you that burns their hands and feet because they can't feel anything, plays violent video games day and night and can't be left alone even to go to the bathroom, then lock up your guns and the nut. Some simple common sense once again would have prevented a horrible disaster. I personally was shocked that everyone in the town wasn't surprised it was him. From all accounts, the school in Newtown was more prepared than most. Sadly, it still didn't stop it. We can't live in a cocoon. Home school is the only way to protect our kids 100 percent. Is that what we want? We just never stop thinking of new ways to spend money.

Reply

Dave Abbott

9:29 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I would ask that everyone try to be a little patient. I understand you might want figures for what different things cost but the reality is that the process of determining our options and costs will take time, hence why only phase one was presented for the upcoming town meeting, and that took until the last minute. To answer what I can, improvements would be for our active schools, not North or Aggie. Costs would be different for each of these building, as they all have different designs with each presenting a unique challenge to get them to a common standard (I cannot be more specific at this time). When I can provide the consultant name I will.

I too am always concerned about costs. I can only say that I have not seen anything that appears excessive in the planning so far. That does not mean something might not be expensive, just that it appears justified. I cannot be specific, as the time for public discussion is a way off.

Reply
Comment_arrow

deb of see-attleboro

5:29 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

I'm not only concerned about cost. I am also concerned about process. Shouldn't the money come from the MCSF and be managed in coordination with the capital improvement committee? Or maybe that is the plan?

Todd Ouellet

9:41 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

One more before I go. Kudos to all in the blogs that post their real names. That includes you Carol with whom I am so polarized. As for the rest of you, if you really care, be known! Any coward can hide behind anonymity and spout comments. Ill even go as fair to give all my phone and email
Todd Ouellet
508 369 3898
team2aseekonk@gmail.com

Reply

Emcee of Seekonk

7:29 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

@Carol... "If we can, through training, desensitize people to taking lives, we can also, through training, resensitize people to valuing human life -- their own and others."

I agree with you 100%. However, I think it would take three generations to get the job done, and everyone would have to be in sync. A lot of parents lose control of or influence over their children at a certain age. The pull of the outside world is stronger than even the best of homes. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't start trying.

There is another active string on Patch about religious schools. Although I'm not terribly religious, certainly don't participate in anything, I believe in the teachings and calming effect of most religions. Kids seem more polite to one another, to their teachers, etc. when attending these schools.

Reply
Comment_arrow

deb of see-attleboro

7:43 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Which string is that, Emcee? Did I miss it?

Comment_arrow

Carol Bragg

5:29 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Emcee: I always appreciate your comments and the tone in which you offer them.
Yes, I agree that it will take three generations to get the job done. Two generations have watched as the problem has grown worse. I recommend nonviolence education based on my own professional experience in Rhode Island. I began serious organizing of nonviolence training in the wake of a spate of fatal shootings in the South Providence-Elmwood and Mt. Hope neighborhoods. We did week-long Youth Leadership Academies for at-risk youth, sponsored nonviolence training for 20 Providence police officers who then taught at-risk middle school students at the Providence Police Academy, oversaw a nonviolence training program at the RI Training School for Youth juvenile facility that the director of DCYF credited with keeping the lid on over-crowded conditions, trained Providence school teachers who incorporated nonviolence education into their curricula, and did a program at the Textron-Chamber of Commerce Academy. We reduced the recidivism rate at the RITSY (saving taxpayers money) and turned around gang members. This training -- as well as subsequent training and the street workers program of the Institute for the Study and Practice of Nonviolence -- not only reduced youth violence. It also enabled lower income students to develop real leadership skills. One was appointed to the Providence School Board. But funding was always a problem. We need to make a societal and institutional commitment.

Comment_arrow

Carol Bragg

5:57 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Emcee: I should add that we don't seem to care about cost-effectiveness. It costs far more to incarcerate youth and adults than it would cost to do effective nonviolence education in our schools. The estimate for incarcerating a young person at the RI Training School for Youth in the late 90s was about $80,000 a year -- far in excess of the per pupil cost of public school education.

Emcee of Seekonk

7:56 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

@ deb ...

I just went to look for the string called 'Catholic Schools Raise the...', and it appears to have been taken down. Just as well since it got corrupted immediately with pedaphelia.

Reply
Comment_arrow

deb of see-attleboro

10:02 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Agreed. I flagged the first comment as inappropriate to no avail. Inappropriate is such a subjective thing. Then I was just going to ignore the hate. But once you made your very appropriate response, I could no longer resist. I'm only human, ya know!

Patch_comments_icon

Jonathan Friedman

9:31 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

It was taken down at the request of the person who submitted it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Emcee of Seekonk

10:00 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Sigh. Too bad because it had the potential of being an interesting conversation if it had not been spoiled immediately.

Emcee of Seekonk

8:08 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

@Carol... "We need to make a societal and institutional commitment."

I agree, but there doesn't seem to be an appetite for that at this time. You seem to stay away from the politics of things, but I believe the tone of a country or any entity is set at the top. Right now there is an awful lot of civil unrest in the country. People are aggitated for any number of reasons: unemployment, taxation, etc. and it shows up primarily in the young. They have energy, albeit misplaced. Rattled and frustrated, they lash out. They kill at will. Life has no value, their own included.

I think the concept of a god is a good thing for a population to have. It is an anchor. Because religions generally preach non violence and have family values and respect life, they have a calming effect. The young work off their energy playing sports instead of cruising around the neighborhood to see who they can kill.

Non-violence can be taught in the schools and it probably is, but in the crowded, desperate, lawless ghettos of Chicago and Detroit, no one is listening.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Todd Ouellet

6:52 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Emcee, I agree. But let us delineate between being non-violent and being a pacifist. One of the reasons we have this bully epidemic in society is we bringing up a generation of people that can to stand up for themselves. The last great generation that brought us through WWII understood that concept. Again maybe we should revisit our history before we move forward.

Leave a comment