The previous post was removed due to the use of profanity. Using symbols to replace some letters does not make a word OK to use on this board. Please keep it clean.

Mr. Murphy obviously doesn't know Jennifer Crowder at all because she is not weak minded to be used as a pawn for anyone. Sticks & Stones Sir!

Mr. Murphy, I don't want you involved in my children's schools either because you do not have children that go to Attleboro Public Schools. Why should I believe that you are really concerned about my 3 son's education. Why drag this whole thing out Mr Murphy? You could have shown a license and ended this whole thing without wasting so much time and effort from the citizens of Attleboro and the elections committee. If you're so interested in helping the schools go fill out a volunteer slip and cori at any of the schools and go read a book, join a PTO or help tutor math, those are much more helpful ways than politics.

As for Ms. Enegren, she doesn't belong on the board either. If you are going to be on the board, be 100% on the board. Be a presence in the community. If your business and your significant other is in Florida, make your life in Florida. Give someone that lives in Attleboro 100% of the time a chance to help the schools.

If our Mayor lived 45% of the time in Florida I'd be very upset because he is also a representative of Attleboro. Thankfully he doesn't, I like seeing the Mayor all around town it makes me feel as though he actually knows what's going on in Attleboro. The same standards should apply to the school board, because they are helping with the education of our leaders of tomorrow.

Are there other school committee members with no children in the schools? And why don't they have the right to serve regardless??

Sorry about that Mr. Friedman -- I should have realized that it wasn't the best way to express myself. Ooops My comments were that Mr. DiCiacco should just go back home unless he can be productive. He didn't interject at the meeting to offer anything helpful. He is clearly just out there stir up trouble. My concern is that when he was Chairman of the School Board there were backdoor handshake deals with the prior business manager and some unions and he was never made to answer for it. This should have been investigated. As for Ms. Enegrin being on the school board, why do people always bring this up where it doesn't belong and let's not forget Chys, this is not a volunteer spot that she is taking away from someone else. You say "Give someone that lives in Attleboro 100% of the time a chance to help the schools." No one in Ward 1 was running and she was the only one willing to. She her situation for all the voters to know, up front. Why is that a bad thing? She was elected by the voters in her Ward. I guess honesty is not the best policy! Only at the last minutes did someone step up to the challenge. And that person had been on the boarding in the past and did nothing. I can say that because I lived in his ward at the time and was disappointed. Don't blame someone for being elected. Should the President never leave the White House? Many have run the country from other locations.......major difference I know but still very true.

Thank you for adjusting the comment.

Christine:

Excuse my bias but I would not choose a Pediatrician that doesn't have children and I don't want to have people in charge of making rules for the schools that do not have children either. Granted people with children can make some pretty stupid decisions politically and privately, but that is my choice with my vote.

@ David Murphy...You Sir well I have no words!!! I'm disgusted Mr. Murphy that you still continue to sit with a seat on that committee after you speak such unprofessional like words about a parent who's fighting for her child's rights!! Well hang on tight cause I'm about to join her and I'm one VERY UNHAPPY PARENT with lots and lots proof that's going to send this town for a shock!!! Calls have been made and higher than state level, forms filed....and next round coming up!! I have not one use for "helpers" just "do'ers"!!!! *** The US Constitution States: If you see someone inhibiting the rights of another individual, you are responsible for defending those rights!!! *** That's why schoolsneedchange.com was created to help defend the rights of others!!!

I'm of the opinion that having children in the system should not be a pre-requisite for serving on the committee. Members without children in the system seem to be more impartial. Its funny how this seems to be an obstacle for people. I recall Mike Levinson (who I feel represented my district wonderfully after Mr. Levine stepped down) being ridiculed in an open meeting for not having children. They may not have children in our schools now, but who is to say that they won't at some point and so they do have an interest in what is going on. Maybe we would have more effective decisions being made if MORE of our members were not parents with children currently in the schools.

@ SD....So how impartial are we talking about huh??? This silly Murphy hasn't even as much as said BOO to me regarding the severity of our child's situation so that's pretty much how I feel about your opinion!

Chrys, only parents can be on school committees. Where is this law because it would be unconstitutional. Why do you people hate Murphy. Is it that he's competent, committed, mature? It it because, unlike SC members who claim it, dedicated to doing an excellent job on the SC.
This charge was an attempt to humiliate David Murphy. It failed. It was the only thing his detractors have against him, that and the nonsense about being a parent. How narrow can you folks get? Let's stop with the distractions and petty criticisms. How silly can you get?

@ Gretchen...David Murphy is so committed, competent and such a dedicated SC Member that he couldn't even show at the meeting to "clear" himself...He's a waste of my time that's for sure! Tell me Gretchen do you have a child with a disability in APS who is being violated right now??? If you did, you also would use what ever legal means necessary to help your child!

Does trying to belittle others opinions make you feel better? I do sympathize with your plight, as little as I know of your situation. However I do feel that you may be unjustly condemning the entire administration and school committee. Every system has it's defficiencies and unfortunately sometimes it takes extreme cases to bring them to light. No system is perfect and I hope that you find a resolution that can pacify your anger, resolve your issues, and make our district stronger. Unfortunately, if you display the same venom which you post online with, it would turn anyone away. There is a distinct difference between agressiveness and assertiveness. As far as Mr. Murphy goes, perhaps he left the decision to the governing body and felt no need to "clear" himself. Maybe if everyone stopped attacking the committee and the administration both from the outside and within, they could all actually get down to the business of running our schools instead of running for cover.

Belittle others??? Kidding me right?? You obviously don't know me at all. And to be honest I really don't give a crap about Murphy and his housing issues but what I do care about is that he holds a seat on a committee that I needed to take action and they didn't. So now word is there is a way to maybe remove him so guess what yeah I'm in! Of course!!! I want answers from someone...I deserve it! Assertiveness was already exhausted so time to move to aggressiveness...Laws have been broken...that means someone needs to pay for that!! PERIOD!!! Law is the Law! Murphy should know that better than anyone!

And really if you care about our district you should go to my site and see just what's going on. You will see....
www.schoolsneedchange.com

@ Reason my website doesn't lack information....it just requires that you use a REAL NAME and REAL log in creditals to use the site....My issues are stated clear as day in my forums....I also have plenty of documents to back each and every thing I say. I will meet with you any time any place if you'd like to (show) you the issues. Not for nothing but I've followed all the protocols that I should have and still nothing...So now I guess it's just time for all the legal stuff to start happening. Can't believe you can't get anywhere in this pathethic world without forcing people's hand...even when they are wrong!!! sad sad sad!!! But just to save face I will post a small section on my blog which is public for everyone to read....REASON...??? Is that your birth name btw??? NICE!!! Now who lacks information

just get out of the way of the School Committee. Attacking a school committee member with bogus complaints works against the SC doing its work. By the way you attack people who try to reason with you, you demonstrate how enraged you are.

I have also had Mr. Murphy not return phone calls or speak with me. The point is if he had children in the schools and lived in Attleboro, then maybe he would be more concerned with a voter/taxpayer's concerns. He does not know the issues and does not want to help his constituents. This is why I hope Ms. Crowder continues with her complaint and proves Mr. Murphy to be a non resident of Attleboro. Every parent and child thanks you Ms. Crowder. You are standing up for the children and doing what is best for Attleboro's schools. Mr. Murphy reminds me of formere committee member Mike Levinson, they both only cared about the Administration and did not do what was in the best interest for the children's education. Mr. Levinson was not elected because of this and Mr. Parent replaced him because he had children in the system and care about the children. Mr. Parent is not just a "yes" man to adminstration. Mr. Murphy will serve his fate in the end. He will either be asked to resign from the committee due to resident issues or will not be re-elected if he runs again. I am also aghast by people saying it is ok if Murphy doesn't live in Attleboro because he is a "good guy". This does not make it right to run for an office in a city in which you do not live. Mr. Murphy will not so proof of his residence, sounds like there is more to this and maybe that prooff doesn't exist......Think about it!!!!!

@ Gretchen....crusade?? purpose?? That purpose and sole purpose is to be a mom and protect my children, sorry if my assertive, aggressive, determined and very much outspoken character frightens you but my time is my time and I'll spend as much as I need to correct issues for my child and anyone else's that wants my help!!

"fightens" me? There's a cabal of folks, apparently, out to get Mr. Murphy for the 'crime' of not having children. That is bizarre to me. To require someone to have children to be on the School Committee? to heap all your anger and frustration on Mr. Murphy, the SC, the Administration. Yes, there are times in life when we get angry and frustrated, but seriously, I think your attempts are not going to play well with most Attleboro residents.

If the Election Commission determined (and determines again after refiling) that Mr. Murphy was duefully elected, then this issue should be let go. If people are dissatisfied with his performance, then that is what the election next year is for. If Ms. Enegren was voted in with her constituents knowing that she was not present in Attleboro 45% of the time, then those opposed have an opportunity to remove her during the next election as well. We really need to let the entire administration actually focus on what we need them to do, not dodge all these bullets. If all the phone calls/emails to Mr. Murphy are about his residency and as demeaning as the comments on these blogs, I wouldn't return phone calls either.

SD, totally agree. This tempest in a tea cup is getting boring and I have constructive things to do with my time so I'm getting off this thread. People like you, SD have common sense. Turns out common sense it not all that common....

@ Gretchen once again I don't care if the man has kids where he lives (unless it violates election running rules) or what color socks the man wears what I do care about is the fact that the SC has a job to do and he's not doing his according to some constituents. I merely was joining in with Ms. Crowder in support as we have similar issues with the district. Furthermore the information you are seeking...Are you in Law Enforcement??? Work for a government agency able to assist me??? Because that sure would be helpful in delegating my "lack" of time carefully editing the multiple documents so my child has some protection with his privacy! And you say angry multiple times...I'm not angry...I'm SICK!!

@ Kathy Taylor couldn't agree with you more!!

@Sarah.....logged on to your site. Still couldn't find any info you claimed that laws were broken. Can you direct me to the correct link to that info?

I also think that School Committee members do not have to have children in the schools for a few reasons.

First, such a criterion may preclude some very talented people from serving. For example, suppose the head of the School of Education at Harvard lives in Attleboro and decides to run for school committee but does not have kids for one reason or another. Can we really say that this person does not know enough about what is best for children? What about an educator (teacher/administrator) in another district?

Second, the schools should be a concern for the whole community- not just the parents. Parents certainly have a more immediate investment in the schools, but every citizen is affected by the schools one way or another. On one hand, better educational opportunities and a higher rated school system means more people moving to Attleboro to pay taxes for more emergency personnel and services from the City. On the other hand, an elderly citizen robbed by a high school dropout probably would wish there were better opportunities to keep that kid in school and make better decisions.

Finally, whether or not a person has a child in the system may be a matter of extreme privacy. Some families have to wait for the right time to have kids for financial reasons. Others may not be able to have kids for one reason or another. Should these folks not be allowed to serve on the School Committee because of something like this? And is it any of our business?

@ Laura...Would just like to "Thank You" for seeing the TRUTH!!!

@ Rob, I agree with you that an SC school member does not need to have a child in the system, providing they have the children and the city's best interest at heart. Once my son is no longer in the school system I will still very much care about the city and the schools. I do understand why people would people would feel better if they knew a SC member had a child in the system, (maybe they wouldn't question motivation on certain decisions).I also agree with your point that a better rated school system will draw people to our city. It all boils down to doing the right thing and being an adult about it. You do what's best for the kids and the city, sounds so simple right? maybe, maybe not

@ Rob, I understand what you're saying about the job interview but, it's kind of not the same in the sense that if you're asked in a job interview if you have children, then you can assume they they may assume you cannot do your job if your too busy at home with the 10 children. I agree it shouldn't nec sway our vote, but it is what it is. Fran Ziot has been on the school committee forever and all her kids went to private schools, it didn't sway the peoples vote ( if they knew). People are going to defend or complain no matter who is there. I guess as a parent I have to hope I voted for the right people and they do the right thing. Keeping in mind that I will always go to meetings, read articles and keep up with what's going on with my childs education and speak up for what I feel is right. I always tell my son, " stand up for what's right, even if you stand alone"

@christine
There has been no compassion in any of your comments you posted thus far. Also you do not need to be speaking for other people they are capable of that themselves. Sarah has been stating to come to the site to learn more, yes, and as you pointed out the documents are not there yet this we obviously know. This takes some time and no she does not have have all the time in the world like you state. She is trying to get people to the site to build an audience and to get conversation flowing. The documents will be uploaded in due time. If you regret going to the site then that is too bad as it's there to help but you gave your opinion and view on that so its not needed anymore as it is not helping anyone or providing any service. Unfortunately for many it's people that don't have the desire to want to learn more or see these documents that are only feeding to the problems that are present. Do you know what the police meant? No because you have no idea what you are talking about as you have no information. It's hard to make such insinuations when you have no facts or hard information. And saying that she's the definition of "worst nightmare" well that is degrading. If you have nothing to provide that will not help the kids or the community then it's most likely better left not said.

@Kevin, just because I didn't express compassion in my comments, doesn't mean I didn't feel them within. I sympathize with anybody who is in the situation Sarah is in and am fortunate to have never had such an experience. I never stated anything regarding her having "all the time in the world". Please read MY comments carefully, then go back and read all of Sarah's and see who degraded who. I am a long time follower of the Patch but new to contributing comments as I have written a total of 6 between 3 different subjects. I have never once spoken for other people as you must have me confused with someone else. As far as Sarah's website, I took her advice she gave me (in another blog) and went to the site for more information as she stated in that other blog that it was all there for all to see. I was only inquiring because I wasn't sure if what I was doing within the site was correct as anything I clicked on, didn't allow me access anywhere else. If the site is not up and running correctly, why send people there? All I was doing was trying to understand more about the district and how the laws are being broken as she stated as I have an interest in the school system as well with 2 kids in it. I was asking her questions I thought I could get answers to without being called "the most impatient and inconsiderate person". Obviously she misinterpreted the tone of my question and jumped to conclusions thinking I was attacking her when I wasn't. Good luck with your website.

@christine
It's not that you didn't express compassion it's that in a lot of your comments there was no compassion. As for the all the time in the world yes that comment was made by someone else my mistake on that. I don't need to read Sarah's comments because if you didn't notice by the last name I'm her husband and the father of our child who is having trouble with this school district. I have been up to date and only decided to comment now as I didn't like comments that were being made, and I can tell by other people I'm not the only one. It's in no way constructive or needed. If there's an issue with the site use the contact us page and explain the issue instead of posting it here saying there's nothing there. Like Sarah stated multiple times the material is still being posted. We want people to start registering that's our decision to ask of that. The site is up and running as you are the first to tell us of any issues.

If you think the school commitee or someone on it isn't doing the job correctly then run against them. You all seem to know whats best and have all the answers. I will have a nice laugh when I go to vote and all these members people complain about run uncontested. I have two young children and I know that it really doesn't matter what the school is like, if you raise them right and give them good values they will do fine.

So true Adam!