patching...
Update: Get our newsletter in your inbox every morning. Get connected by signing up here. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Proposal to Limit BOS' Power Hits Legal Wall

Seekonk selectmen request a legal opinion whether a measure that would prevent them from serving on other town boards in most cases can be placed on a town meeting agenda.

 

Whether a proposal to prohibit selectmen from serving on other boards in most cases can be placed on a June town meeting agenda could depend on a lawyer's interpretation of the laws of Seekonk and Massachusetts.

The selectmen voted 3-2 Wednesday to seek legal advice on whether a petition featuring more than 100 signatures forced them to put the measure before town meeting voters.

Selectman Bill Rice, with the help of activists, collected the signatures to get the item on the agenda for the special town meeting (which will take place on the same night as the annual town meeting). Town Administrator Pam Nolan said more than 100 signatures on the petition were certified by the town clerk, exceeding the threshold required by the town charter. Selectmen Gary Sagar and Bob McLintock disagreed with her.

The charter states a petition featuring the signatures of "at least 100 registered voters may secure" the inclusion of a measure "for any duly scheduled special town meeting."

Only 10 signatures are needed to get an item on the agenda for an annual town meeting, but the deadline has passed for placing measures on that agenda.

McLintock and Sagar, who are opposed to the measure, said the use of the word "may" rather than "shall" in the charter means it would be up to the selectmen to determine whether the item should be placed on the agenda. However, Selectman Dave Parker noted that the Massachusetts law uses the word "shall," and he said state law supersedes town law.

McLintock said the issue should go to an attorney, angering board Chair Francis Cavaco, who said the town was spending too much money on legal advice.

"We can't be going to legal all the time … legal for this, legal for that; the dollar runs up," Cavaco said. "Legal don't care. It's billable hours."

Despite this statement, Cavaco voted with Sagar and McLintock to seek legal advice.

Rice said quietly, although it was picked up his microphone, "This board is going to get sued." He said loudly, "This is totally legal and I expect this board to respect the legality of our town charter."

Nelson Almeida, who helped Rice collect signatures, told Attleboro-Seekonk Patch that the law was clearly on the side of the petitioners.

"It's state law that the petition needs to be accepted," Almeida said. "The people run the town, not the selectmen. The people need to vote if selectmen should be able to serve on multiple boards, not the selectmen."

The proposal to limit selectmen's power stems from public opposition to last year's appointments of Cavaco and McLintock to the Board of Health. Parker proposed last week that an item be placed on the town meeting agenda, but a final vote was not taken. Rice then started his petition, which called for a measure similar to Parker's proposal.

An exception to the prohibition, under Rice's measure, would be if a board did not have a quorum. A selectman could be appointed to serve until a replacement were found.

Rice said last week that allowing selectmen to serve on other boards was "an abuse of power." McLintock said this week that selectmen were placed on the BOH to settle the "constant battle" between its members and selectmen, and to "impress on [BOH members] what the issues were" regarding the board's purpose of serving the people.

He said limiting the selectmen's ability to appoint its members to a board would be a big mistake.

"I really don't think you can strip away the authority of the Board of Selectmen," McLintock said. "They are elected by all of the electorate in this town. And if this passes, there is just going to be nothing for them to do because they won't have the authority to do it."

The date of the town meeting was officially set for June 11. It had been originally scheduled for June 25, but was adjusted at the request of the school district to give earlier notice for teachers who might be laid off.

The start time of the meeting was adjusted again to 7 p.m. Selectmen had voted last week to move it to 6 p.m., but Sagar asked for another vote to be taken because he had changed his mind. McLintock was the lone vote against the re-adjustment.

Shortly after the town meeting begins, it will be adjourned so that the special session can take place. The lone item on the special agenda will be the senior center measure, and the proposal to limit selectmen's power could be added. After the special meeting concludes, the regular session will restart.

Also at the meeting on Wednesday, selectmen voted to appoint Robert Costa Jr. to fill a vacancy on the BOH. Almeida, who impressed many political observers with his surprising third-place finish in last month's selectmen election, was voted onto the Parks and Recreation Committee. He had applied for the BOH appointment as well.

Related Topics: Seekonk Board of Selectmen and Town Meeting

Carol Bragg

9:18 am on Friday, May 4, 2012

It's not a legal wall that the petition has hit but the wall beyond which critical thinking and reading comprehension take place. It's sad, indeed, when Seekonk's elected officials have to hire a Boston attorney to interpret Seekonk's town documents. I wonder whether Massachusetts uses our tax dollars to get legal opinions from other states about Mass General Law and whether the federal government pays attorneys in Germany and Japan to interpret U.S. laws.

Reply

deb of see-attleboro

10:51 am on Friday, May 4, 2012

I am sorry it has had to come to this. However, I must agree with Mr Rice. No legal opinion was necessary. Mr Parker and Mr Rice did not think one was necessary. But Mr Mclintock and Mr Sagar found the language in the charter confusing. Again, I think they are grasping at straws. As the deciding vote, Mr Cavaco sealed the deal. We must spend taxpayer money on a legal opinion which is, IMO, unnecessary. Couldn't Mr Sagar simply ask his colleague on the ZBA to give a legal opinion for free?

Article 2, sec.6 of the charter is pretty clear. It states as follows:

"Any ten voters of the town may SECURE, by written petition to the board of selectman, the inclusion of an article or item for the warrant or agenda of any session of the annual town meeting and at least 100 registered voters may SECURE the same for any duly scheduled special town meeting".

The operative word is SECURE. Not "may", as Mr S and Mr M insist. And even if I am wrong, I believe precedent has been set time and time again. To my knowledge, no board has ever challenged the wording of this section. And believe me, there are times I wish they could have. No one is going to stack the meeting for this nonsense.
This type of shenanigans happens all the the all the time at state and federal level and is one reason why this country is in decline.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Jonathan Friedman

11:01 am on Friday, May 4, 2012

I have added some additional information to the article, including quotes.

Reply

Carol Bragg

3:23 pm on Friday, May 4, 2012

Amen, Deb. If the Selectmen did their jobs properly, they wouldn't have time to serve on other boards and committees. They're elected to serve on the Board of Selectmen, not to run the whole town.

Reply

deb of see-attleboro

4:01 pm on Friday, May 4, 2012

Thank you, Jonathan.

This is ridiculous. It is time to put an end to this. I think someone on the BOS should insist on an up or down vote be taken on behalf of Mr Nelson Almeida.

Mclintock's appointment could not possibly have been considered permanent. I believe it is a violation of the charter or by-laws for such an appointment to be made. It is time for the grown-ups on the board to behave as such. It is an embarrassment that town meeting is going to be asked to make another by-law because four elected men can't see the writing on the wall. Do the right thing before you are called to the carpet for possible ethics violations.

Reply

Joe

8:16 pm on Friday, May 4, 2012

As a former selectman has said "It is time for them to learn how to play in the sandbox." It would be interesting how much the town has incured in legal fees the past year because of the BOS members. I will bet it is a pretty penny. Why? If you all remember this situation with the Board of Health came about because Cavaco and McLintock did not like the 2 members of the Board who were up for reappointment so they refused to recommend them for reappointment. It is going to be a long year with Francis running the show.

Reply

Carol Bragg

10:36 am on Saturday, May 5, 2012

Yes, I remember him reading from Robert Fulghum's "All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten." And I recall thinking about the sandbox and how boys at that age are told they can't cry, so they start hitting instead. Some never stop hitting. Hitting people starts fights but doesn't solve problems or reconcile differences.

Reply

paul

12:22 pm on Saturday, May 5, 2012

The new BOS has picked up where the old one left off.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Emcee of Seekonk

2:11 pm on Saturday, May 5, 2012

Not too surprising since all but one member is from the old board.

Leave a comment