GOP Congressional Candidates Talk Entitlement Programs, the Economy and Foreign Policy
Sean Bielat, Elizabeth Childs and David Steinhoff square off at a debate in Attleboro.
Fourth Congressional District Republican candidates squared off Monday night in front of a packed lecture hall at Bristol Community College's Attleboro campus to debate issues ranging from Social Security and Medicare, foreign policy, taxes and the economy.
Candidates Sean Bielat, Elizabeth Childs and David Steinhof took questions from a panel that included Bob Folcik of WVBF Radio in Taunton, George Calajezzi of WSAR in Fall River, Jim Hand of the The Sun Chronicle and Jonathan Friedman of Patch in an event that was sponsored by The South Coast GOP and the Republican Women of Bristol/Norfolk County. Jack Lank, president of the United Regional Chamber of Commerce, was the moderator.
While updating the tax code, repealing "Obamacare" and decreasing the national debt were common themes among all three candidates during the panel questioning, things became more contentious when candidates had the opportunity to ask each other questions at the end of the forum.
The meeting was the first since an exchange of words after an NECN debate on July 31 in which Childs and Steinhof questioned Bielat's six-figure salary he received while working for his company Oneclickpolitics.com.
Monday, Childs again called into question Bielat's "electability and credibility" because she said he didn't give straight answers and wasn't transparent to voters.
Childs also questioned why Bielat didn't choose to run until he learned current Congressman Barney Frank would not run for re-election. Bielat responded that he would run against Frank again, especially with a more Republican friendly district since district lines had been redrawn.
With the recent appointment of Paul Ryan as Mitt Romney's Republican running mate for President, all three candidates said entitlement reform was needed
Childs said Ryan's vouchers proposal was "not a crazy idea," but she would begin by means testing for Medicare and distributing block grants to states for Medicaid.
"At the very least, Paul Ryan has reached across the aisle and met with Democrats to save Medicare," she said. "That should not be a partisan issue."
All three also agreed that "Obamacare" needed to be repealed.
"The federal government does not belong in health care as much as it has been," Steinhof said.
He added, "Competition always derives better performance."
Bielat said there should not be "fear-mongering" when discussing entitlement reform—something he said he experienced when he suggested in his 2010 campaign against Frank that retirement ages should be raised for future generations.
Bielat said the key to jump-starting the economy was to allow businesses to spend their own money and make a regulatory environment clear so business owners know what to expect, while Steinhof said he was for a simplified tax code and lowering taxes across the board to create more jobs in the private sector.
Steinhof was the only one of the three to sign a pledge not to increase taxes. He elaborated on his pledge Monday saying he would allow for more taxes only "in the event of an emergency such as a war," and it would only be "for the short term."
For Childs, decreasing government and the national debt could be accomplished through identifying "functions" in a bureaucracy that are necessary rather than slashing entire departments.
"It is overly simplifying it by saying we're going to cut this department and cut that department," she said.
Bielat, who is a Marine, added that instead of cutting military personnel in the nation's largest budget item, the military, cuts should be made in a growing defense bureaucracy.
A Marine, Bielat said he agreed with a military strategy that gave more power back to congress because it better represented "the will of the American people". He pointed to recent strikes on Libya ordered by President Obama through the War Powers Resolution.
On the subject of Israel, Childs said America should stand by Israel if it were to decide to use military power against Iran. She said President Obama has been "wishy-washy" in his stance on Israel.
"Israel is our ally and we should support them," she said.
Steinhof added that he agreed with Mitt Romney's recent assertion that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel.
The three Republican candidates will meet again Tuesday night at Stonehill College in Easton. Their debate will be preceded by a forum with Democratic candidates Joseph Kennedy III, Rachel Brown and Herb Robinson.
The event will be moderated by Lisa Strattan, associate publisher and editor of The Herald News and The Taunton Daily Gazette. The forum's panelists will be drawn from WCVB, Wicked Local and WGBH Radio.
The event will take place at Alumni Hall. Free Parking is available in Lot 7. Alumni Hall is handicap accessible.
For tickets to the forums, contact The Martin Institute at martininstitute@stonehill.edu or 508-565-1131.
Paul Buckley
6:41 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Excellent debate last night. The Seekonk Republican Town Committee is proud to have worked together with a great group of sponsors putting this together. The candidates and the panel did a fine job in participating. Look forward to tonight's debate.
Gretchen Robinson
2:42 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Nobody represents a good, decent Republican as does former president Dwight D. Eisenhower. Americans of all political persuasions liked him and his wife Mamie, she in her "good Republican wool coat."
This trio of Tea Party extremists should be ashamed of themselves for the petty, warmed-over Ayn Rand economics they tout.
Here's a quote by "Ike."
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2004/101904.html:
"Should any political party attempt to abolish Social Security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these stupid things, but their numbers are negligible and they are stupid." President Dwight D. Eisenhower.
Emcee of Seekonk
3:00 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
When are we going to get to see Kennedy (aka Howdy Doody to some) and his gang in a debate so we can twist and pull apart everything he says and even what he doesn't say? Biden told an audience today that the GOP would 'put them back in chains'. I can't imagine who he was addressing. Now Biden is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but c'mon now.
Jonathan Friedman
3:13 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Kennedy is debating fellow Democratic candidates tonight.
Malene Robinson
4:37 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Watch the debate live at Heraldnews.com or tauntongazette.com.
Malene Robinson
4:37 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Tonight at 6 PM
Carol Bragg
5:33 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Question: Are people capable of focusing on the issues and refraining from denigrating the individuals?
deb of see-attleboro
5:53 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Probably not. IMO, the issues are far too complex for either party's candidates. So "we the plebeians" turn it into sport.
Malene Robinson
5:57 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Why don't you check out Rachel Brown's platform: www.rachelbrown.net. Or watch the debate in 3 min.
deb of see-attleboro
6:31 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
I could not get past "Larouche Democrat for Congress". Explanation please?
Emcee of Seekonk
6:56 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
@deb... apparently no one wants to explain what a LaRouche Democrat is. After digging around a bit, I can understand why. They are totally against Obama and appear to be socialists on steroids. Definitely not your grandfather's Democrat.
deb of see-attleboro
7:32 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
I believe it is the Larouche camp that was setting up "informational" stands around the area. Maybe you saw them? The group I saw displayed that obscene picture of Obama with a Hitler mustache. Not sure if they were of Larouche. But I think so.
Carol Bragg
7:05 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Deb: We can ask questions and stimulate discussion:
Competition always derives better performance? What about the banking industry?
Retirement ages should be raised for future generations? What does that do for the younger generation searching for jobs?
Decreasing government? It will save jobs but increase unemployment.
Cutting military personnel in nation's largest budget? Why not if two wars are winding down and we desperately need funds to provide jobs and services to returning vets? Unemployment among 18-24 year old vets was 29% last year.
deb of see-attleboro
7:45 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Again. I think the issues are far too complex. We can ask the questions. And I think all of your questions are some of the same ones I would ask.
However, either the candidates think the average voter is too stupid to understand the issues. Or the candidates are just as clueless as the rest of us.
Emcee of Seekonk
7:20 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Carol, every discussion on this blog turns into a political sling fest, and it will be that way until after the election. Maybe then, if we are not all too weary and battered, we can have a civil debate. Hopefully we can discuss some of the important things going on in Seekonk, like (as deb mentioned a while back) the impending rezoning of Firefly. I'm still trying to figure out how the developer is going to pump all that sewerage up the Mill Street hill to processing plants in the Green Briar Estates complex. If that ever fails along the way (natural disaster or otherwise), it is going to be a major yech.
Emcee of Seekonk
7:09 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
@deb... Paul Ryan is good at explaining things at a workman's level. He grabs a mike and walks across the stage and back. No teleprompters for him, or prepared speeches. He's quick to learn and he's learned that talking about numbers is the quickest way to lose an audience.
Emcee of Seekonk
7:55 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
@deb... "... Larouche camp that was setting up "informational" stands..."
This is my first excursion into Larouche philosophy, but undoubtedly it was them with their total dislike for Obama. Odd that the Democrats would possibly allow someone like that to slip into the HOR to represent them. Makes wealthy young Joe seem like a far better nominee. Maybe that was the plan.
At any rate, my vote goes to whoever the Republicans nominate.