patching...
Update: Get our newsletter in your inbox every morning. Get connected by signing up here. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Councilors Spar over Revising Attleboro Laws

Councilor Shannon Heagney wants a committee to review the city's ordinances for possible revision. Council President Frank Cook says he needs to talk to the mayor about that first.

 

A proposal for a City Council committee to review Attleboro's ordinances and determine if any could be removed because they are out of date or conflict with state laws turned into a 30-minute debate Tuesday night between two councilors.

Councilors Shannon Heagney and Jeremy Denlea proposed that a council subcommittee review the municipal laws for possible changes. Usually when a councilor makes a proposal, Council President Frank Cook determines which committee (whether it be an existing one or a new one) should review it in preparation for a possible recommendation to the full council. However, this time he said he wanted to refer the item to the city's administration, which means Mayor Kevin Dumas and Budget and Administration Director Barry LaCasse.

This unusual decision did not sit well with Heagney.


Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone everyday with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.


"They can have a memo sent up to say we're having a discussion, but I don't think it needs to be referred to the administration," she said. 

Heagney said she believed the council's Ordinances Committee, of which she and Denlea are members, could handle the task. She said she researches well and noted that Denlea has a law degree.

Cook said his reasons for referring the proposal to the administration were he wanted to see if they may be working on something similar and he was concerned a council committee review could be time-consuming and expensive.

"To undertake this [ordinance] book and start to revise and so forth is a very significant undertaking," Cook said. "I'm very concerned about its effect on the council in terms of amount of time it's going take. I'm also concerned about the potential cost involved in it [because the city solicitor would need to give his input]."

Heagney said the committee could meet during off-hours for some of the sessions. Cook did not like that idea. He said the committee should only meet during regular hours rather than times when everybody on the council may not be able to attend. Although council committees only have three members, all councilors are allowed to attend the meetings and speak during them.

Other councilors gave their input on this debate, with Mark Cooper siding with Heagney, Peter Blais saying he was divided and Brian Kirby aligning himself with Cook.

Cooper said Dumas and LaCasse could attend a committee meeting or submit a memo on specific ordinances they want reviewed.

The debate concluded with Cook saying he would "talk" to the administration (whether this was different than his original plan to "refer" the proposal to the administration was not clear) and "touch base" with the city solicitor.

Related Topics: Attleboro City Council, Attleboro city ordinances, Barry LaCasse, Frank Cook, Jeremy Denlea, Kevin Dumas, Peter Blais, Shannon Heagney, and mark cooper

Daniel F. Devine

9:01 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012

COOK & KIRBY dare not make a move without checking with KEVIN first to see if it's O.K. with him. What's wrong with the Attleboro voters that continue to vote these "SHEEP" in as City Councilors?

Reply

Tom Dowling

2:04 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012

It is disturbing and disappointing when the President of the Municipal Council appears unable to make a decision without receiving his marching orders first! The term 'separation of powers' seems to have lost its meaning!

Reply

Jerry Chase

4:20 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012

These two gentlemen have analyzed this perfectly. It is OFFENSIVE that F. Cook routinely acts contrary to "the American way" that supposedly he teaches in his day job as a American history instructor. The problem is that he's not the only lying sack of dung on the current Council, he's merely the most egregious one! The Council is loaded with such mayoral synchophants, the worst being Cook, Kirby,
and Blais. It's like they have a contest as to who can best serve the MAYOR.

To Dan Devine: I concede that's it's a bit of a mystery as to why such ill-serving rats keep getting re-elected to the Council; but you can safely bet that this talented mayor has a lot to do with it. He wants an easy ride----what better way to ensure it than but helping HIS representative on the Council to be re-elected, to "rubber-stamp" continually. Credit belongs to Mayor K. Dumas for shrewd politicking.

Reply

Daniel F. Devine

5:04 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012

@Jerry, The worst part is that these loosers probably have aspirations of being Mayor someday when Kevin doesn't want the position anymore. Can you imagine that? ~ S C A R Y !

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jerry Chase

3:51 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Dan, how's the following alternative for scary? P. Blais becomes the new Council president in early 2014. This guy spends OUR money worse than a drunk sailor!!

Happy New Year, Dan.

Jerry Chase

3:57 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013

The term, "city solicitor" is a definite misnomer: he is the mayor's solicitor. The mayor hires this attorney, and the current one's law firm in Quincy has been "reaping the harvest" for several years now-----for a part-time gig, no less!

Since the "city" solicitor is hired by the mayor and only reports to the mayor, is there any chance of a legal opinion going against the mayor? The mayor's solicitor is NOT an unbiased source of legal opinion, by definition.

Reply

Jerry Chase

4:05 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013

The rationale presented by F. Cook makes about as much sense as trying to make a parachute out of concrete! The irony is that when I started my term on the Council in Jan., '08, it was Brian Kirby who urged me to pursue such a project . . . without the least suggestion that I consult with anyone other than fellow Ordinance committee members. Frank's irrational "defense" is "the emperor with no clothes on", showing strongly his top priority: representing K. Dumas on the Council----NOT Ward 3.

Reply

Leave a comment