Council Approves Farmers Market Restrictions
The City Council spends nearly three hours debating the issue during a meeting that at points became heated.
The future of the Attleboro Farmers Market could be in jeopardy following the City Council's 6-5 decision Monday night in favor of a measure that prevents customers from parking at the market location in the municipal parking lot next to the library and requires organizers to hire a police officer.
The measure includes several features aimed at settling the dispute between members of the Library Board of Trustees and organizers of the market, which takes place on Saturdays from June to October. Trustees say they are concerned about public safety risks they say the market creates.
Market co-organizer Heather Porreca told Attleboro-Seekonk Patch last week following a decision by a special council subcommittee in favor of the measure that the requirement to hire a police officer would be "very difficult for us to afford."
Porreca did not attend Monday's meeting and could not immediately be reached for comment. She said last week that if the police feature made it through a vote of the full council, the market's board of directors would need to meet to decide on the next step.
Linda Binns, acting chair of the Library Board of Trustees, said after the council meeting that she was satisfied with the decision.
"This is as good as it's going to get," Binns said. "Our concern is public safety. We are not against the farmers market."
The council spent nearly three hours debating the measure as various councilors unsuccessfully attempted to amend it. The only amendment that was supported by the council majority came from Councilor Jeremy Denlea. It calls for an understanding among all parties that this would be the last year the municipal lot next to the library would be used for the market.
Denlea said the amendment was needed because he didn't want the council to be discussing this again next year and in subsequent years, and it would "finally settle the public safety concern once and for all."
Councilor Sara-Lynn Reynolds said, "There are 10 places in the city where [the market] could possibly work better. I'm sure that if you start looking at it now, you could find a perfect situation for it."
The amendment was approved 6-5. Councilor Brian Kirby questioned the legality of it and Councilor Richard Conti said the amendment sent the wrong message to a successful local operation.
"I can't think of any motion for this council that would be more forceful to push the farmers market to a surrounding town," Conti said. "I will not support this motion because it's basically booting the number one farmers market in Massachusetts out of Attleboro."
The measure prevents any parking on the property during the summer when the library is closed on Saturdays and limits parking to library patrons during the fall when the facility is open on Saturdays. Councilor Jay DiLisio, who chaired the subcommittee, proposed altering the measure to allow parking for market customers. He said he decided this was best after meeting with market organizers last Thursday.
"I don't think it's right for us to have the farmers market pay for a detail and not allow their patrons to use the lot," DiLisio said.
This amendment was met with opposition from a majority of DiLisio's colleagues on the dais, who said allowing market parking would create a safety risk. However, it was not explained why allowing library parking while the market was operating would not also create this risk.
"To have children and patrons and all these farmers and people selling vegetables and to have 28 to 30 cars parking adjacent to them, it just doesn't seem safe to me," Denlea said.
The session at points got heated.
Councilor Mark Cooper declared after the council's vote on one of more than a dozen motions, "I am so thoroughly confused, I'm dizzy."
Denlea then exclaimed, "Pay more attention. It's all very clear."
After Cooper loudly responded, "It's not very clear," Council President Frank Cook slammed his gavel and called for a recess in an effort to ease the tension.
When the council went back into session, Denlea apologized to Cooper for his statement.
parkst
7:35 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
so once again, in the name of the all powerful concept of "safety" Attleboro has decided to help kill something that actually brought a little life to downtown. Nice work folks. I hope the farmer's market does just pack up and move to a town that actually wants to have good things happen inside its borders. Attleboro can now continue its campaign to destroy its history and replace it with absolutely nothing of value.
Tisiphone
8:58 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Yes, the concept of "safety" has been pushed to extremes. When I hear adult males caution each other to "stay safe", I cringe.
There are forces at work that I think even the governors do not fully grasp. The "police power" clause ot the Constitution permits the government to do almost anything to protect "public safety". I think this reached "city and town" level with Zoning. The zoning power (much newer than many think) was contested up to the Supreme Court as a "taking", requiring "just compensation". The Supreme Court did not deny it was a " taking", but denied the government's obligation to make compensation so long as it was "reasonably related to public safety". Originally,it was. Lot size requirements were to prevent pollution of wells my neighboring septic systems, "set backs" and "side yard" requirements were to prevent to spread of fire. Soon, the governors learned that anything was possible if it related to "public safety". This knowledge spread to other boards. Now, everything is a "safety issue".
Tisiphone
9:07 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Robert Crichton (The Lost World, etc) has written and excellent book about how Americans are held in the grip of fear. "State of Fear".
Mary D
2:53 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
I agree, downtown has been dying for years, and basically it is dead. So the one thing that brought in people from not only Attleboro, but from Seekonk, Norton, Pawtucket, Mansfield, etc. is going to be closed down because of this "public safety" line. I hope the Farmer's Market moves out of Attleboro and sets up in Seekonk.
Samantha
7:46 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
What? How is there any traffic issue, its a parking lot, people park in it. The market is distinctly seperated with cones. This decision will kill the farmers market because people looking to go will be looking to pull into the market only to be waived on by an officer. It's interesting that multiple blocks of downtown can be closed down for several hours at a time for special events but the use of an EMPTY parking lot in a central location is an issue. Shame on the library trustees and shame on the city for letting the library dictate how a municipal lot is used.
Henry
9:14 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
There were so many embarassing moments for the Municipal Council Last Night, from- The Councilor who ran his campaign on small business and chaired the sub-committee that put the strangle hold on the Farmers Market Group (Dilisio) to the City Councilor who stated she wasn't there last year on council but thinks she understands what the issue were (Reynolds)( she must have been out campaigning a lot last September and not been paying attention to what was actually going on in the City she was running for office). Another one was the classless "FIST PUMP" by Councilor Denlea when his amendment was passed, the good thing though is he only rolled his eyes about a thousand times and used Roberts Rules of Order when it suited him. He also aligned himself very nicely with the Democratic Base of the City (APL Trustees) for his dream run at Mayor.
But with all those wonderful moments....This one is my favorite and was voiced very clearly by Senior Council Member Blais and his concern for Public Safety, After years of working in the automotive repair industry he clearly has insight to why Library Patron Cars are not as dangerous as Farmers Markets Cars.-
"This amendment was met with opposition from a majority of DiLisio's colleagues on the dais, who said allowing market parking would create a safety risk. However, it was not explained why allowing library parking while the market was operating would not also create this risk."
Tisiphone
10:09 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Henry, if you cannot understand the "safety issue", see my comments elsewhere. Basically, the Constitution's "Police Powers Clause" gives government almost unlimited authority to regulate matters of "public safety". If a decision is taken to court, it is unusual for a judge to substitute his judgment for that of an elected body. Your only hope is that the board's decision conflicts with one of the other rights, or immunities, granted by the Constitution. i.e. "safe" parking at a polling place that might be used to discourage minority voters from exercising that right.
I don't know that many small city boards actually know this. But, what they do know is that they have seen the "public safety" card played with great success over the years. You hear it constantly in Zoning and Subdivision matters, "emergency vehicles won't be able to enter", etc. Courts decided years ago (zoning is no where near as old as many think) that Zoning is not a "taking" under the Constitution, requiring compensation, because it is protected by the "police powers" clause. So any claim of "Public Safety" can fly in Zoning matters.
Sailor
7:48 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
"I can't think of any motion for this council that would be more forceful to push the farmers market to a surrounding town," Conti said. "I will not support this motion because it's basically booting the number one farmers market in Massachusetts out of Attleboro."
Could be a first! A counselor who possesses both brains and courage simultaneously.
Sailor
7:57 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
"To have children and patrons and all these farmers and people selling vegetables and to have 28 to 30 cars parking adjacent to them, it just doesn't seem safe to me," Denlea said.
Answer me this Ms Denlea: Are you now going to support an ordinance requiring Stop & Shop, Shaws, Seabras et al to hire off duty cops. There are lot more cars around "children and patrons" there than at the farmers market. Gasp, there may even be "all these farmers and people" in the same parking lot. News Flash for Ms Denlea farmers are people and they vote. Oh and I'm quite sure they and everyone else are "paying more attention because "It's all very clear."
Sailor
8:07 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
correction: Ms Denlea should be Mr Denlea. My mistake
Adam Chamberlain
8:39 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
I would like to thank council member Denlea for bringing to light the dangers of parking lots. I have taken my kids to the library for years, never thinking twice that by parking a car and walking through a parking lot I was putting them in harms way. In the future I will have to seriously reconsider parking in the library parking lot or any parking lot for that matter because now I have become aware it is simply not safe.
And then to add the fact that there could potentially be people selling vegetables next to parked cars? Wow, its like a mine field. Parents of Attleboro, we must protect our children from these Vegetables Sellers and all these Parked Cars.
All this time, it was the drug dealers and child molestors I was worried about, when I should be worried about the farmers, patrons of the farmers market, and fresh vegetable dealers. It is not busy intersections, or train tracks I should avoid, it is parking lots with like 28-30 parked cars.
Thank you for bringing these serious safety concerns to my attention. From now on, I will be on constant vigil to avoid parked cars, and anyone looking to sell me some locally grown produce.
parkst
8:44 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
seriously, even getting out of your car downtown is obviously a risk that should be avoided if at all possible. you'd better drive somewhere safer to do business, Attleboro is obviously way too high a risk to even consider patronizing businesses in, thank god the town council is pointing out why it's way too risky to even exit your vehicle down there.
Adam Tellier
8:46 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
With all due respect to all of the council members, last nights meeting ran in circles. I was there for an hour and a half, and frankly, during that time, nothing was accomplished whatsoever. As it was mentioned many times last night they "have been working on this for over a month now." Multiple times the term "Point of order" (referring to Roberts rules of order) was used, especially when an amendment did not work in a certain councilor's favor. At times, councilor did not understand what was going on, and rude comments by their fellow committee members were completely necessary. The argumentativeness of the councilor's truly showed at last night's meeting. The consensus around Attleboro is that both the Library and the Farmers Market are acting childish. This should not have been as large of an issue as it is. The councilor's who have worked on this non-stop for the past few weeks, have truly put there heart an soul into it. I applaud Councilors DiLisio and Cooper for being the members of the sub-committee, to remain publically unbiased through this entire process. The work of the committee shows in the headway they have made, however the progress hit a wall once it was the municipal council's turn to vote. I completely understand the public safety issues at hand, but I only hope that their are auxiliary officers willing to participate, because not only do people want it to, but the downtown are needs the farmers market needs to stay here!
Steven Scott
8:55 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
another BRILLIANT move by the City Council, thank GOD that there are no other safety concerns in the city!
Laura Dolan
9:08 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Such an extreme disappointment. Seems we are our worst enemy. It gets to a point where the supporters, the worker bees behind the scene become exhausted from opposition and give up. THIS is what we choose to finally become concerned for safety? really? If you are going to raise my taxes, show me something! Give us a reason to be proud of our city! If we're going to pay the same taxes as North Attleboro give us what they have, instead of embarrassment. So disgusted....
Ron Carlson
9:31 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
I want a farmers market here. And as much as I hate to say this. parking lots ARE unsafe. I commute to work by bicycle, and I go grocery shopping by bicycle also. Every time I go I see people backing out of spots without looking, usually on their cell phones, and not even coming to a stop when they get to the end of the row, like they are an emergency vehicle with their lights flashing. Not to mention the people who pull out in front of ambulances! I feel we need to start policing ourselves and each other. If we are unable to have enough sense and strength to drive according to the rules and good sense, then we won't have the things that benefit us, like a farmers market.
Adam Chamberlain
9:59 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
I agree that parking lots are unsafe. However, I feel like it is a poor argument, because you can make an argument against anything for fear of safety.
Parking lots are unsafe, riding your bike is unsafe, walking across the street is unsafe.
The issue is about the Farmer Market using that space, and they either want it there or they don't want it there. Saying the space is unsafe is a null argument in my book because you can make that argument about any of the 10 potential spaces in Attleboro. Yes Parking Lots can be unsafe, that being said, do you want the farmers market using that space or don't you. That is the issue, and they made it clear they don't want the farmers market on that space.
Tisiphone
10:20 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
I have noticed that the farmer's market admits that it is just barely self sustaining. It occurs to me that although many favor it's existance, they do not patronize it. I suppose it is time to "put your money where yor mouth is". Alternatively, we have to admit it is just an uneconomic "decoration".
Migsy
7:32 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
My understanding of Attleboro Farmers Market is that it is a non profit organization to serve the community. It's not meant to rake in money.
Roxanne Houghton
10:27 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Here we go again...whenever something new, different or successful comes to Attleboro, its always the same. I would also add to that list, that if its not the "right person's"idea.
Hysteria reigns. The old guard and in this case, the "new" old guard suits up into their respective battle-wear and prepares to drag us all back into the dark ages.
When the shelter volunteers first started their good work at our shelter, the shouts of "its dangerous" began. A healthy wetland ordinance was "dangerous" to homeowners. The hiring of Paramedics only was "dangerous" because they might not be relatives, and therefore not care about the people of Attleboro. Now, the Farmers Market is dangerous. The public safety card is a safe hand to deal, isnt it?
If I were a member of the Farmers Market I would have felt so degraded during the discussion last nite. They have been treated like the unwelcome relatives - absolutely awful - shameful! Even more shameful was Mr DiLisio calling into question Mr. Conti's right to participate in the discussion - how humiliting.
Too many members of this council are caught up in party-affiliations and/or keeping Attleboro, just the way it is.. A perfect example of "no good deed goes unpunished" Only in Attleboro would a Farmers Market be found to be "a danger" to society!
pablo
10:27 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Safety? The city didn't seem concerned back in January with the safety aspect of a four lane highway running through the middle of a car dealership in south attleboro.
Kendelle Aronson
10:28 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Those same safety concerns are driving the need for our schools PTO's to stop having fundraisers that sell things like cookies (that's unhealthy) and for non-profits like the Girl Scouts to have to hire BOTH Police and Fire details to hold a dance for the girls and an adult of their choice, or for our PTO's to do the same for family events. Those kindergarten kids, they're the ones to look out for.
Perhaps that is why we're having such a difficult time finding businesses to give it a go in downtown. It's too dangerous to park in a municipal lot and walk around. You would even have to cross the street!!!
Just sayin'
10:34 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
@Tisiphone - My understanding is that the market does not get a take of the sales. The vendors pay the AFM to have a table there - that is where they get their funds.
Tisiphone
10:53 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
As I recall from a previous article, the AFM nets out about $600 per year. If the substantial volunteer effort were paid, it would probably be underwater. If it were greater, they could afford a detail and this crisis would be at an end (this is not to say I recommend that solution). The "farmers" may pocket something, but they are being subsidized with essentially free space by the city. Apparently, it is not worth it to them to pay for the "Detail". If I recall that is $45 per hour, with a 4 four hour minimum. So, five hours brings it to $360 (the fifth hour requires another four hour minimum) Relatively cheap compared to many cities. I have never heard of a city without the four hour minimum, must be a union demand.
Of course, this is true in spades for public transportation. So, it is simply a decision of whether the benefit justifies the subsidy.
paul
10:42 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Automobiles should be banned from downtown.
Buck Farack
11:42 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
What a clown show. Watching the City Council on the Farmer's Market issue is like watching a monkey humping a football. How can they screw up such a good thing?
Erin
12:17 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Were there any instances during the course of last year's farmers market that warrant such concern over safety in a parking lot? I attended farmers market almost every weekend and never witnessed one car vs pedestrian incident.
I understand the library's concern over parking availability for library patrons in September and October but have any library patrons actually come forward to complain about lack of parking on a Saturday in September or October?
Finally something good comes to the city and the city finds a way to squash it. I'm glad my taxes were spent making all the sidewalks look so pretty. The brick borders, the newly planted trees and fancy light posts look so nice in front of all the run down storefronts and empty buildings on Union St.
Migsy
7:46 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
I wouldn't trust anything APL says about parking issues or otherwise. I find it amazing that the majority of city councilors believe that AFM patrons are bad drive so can't park in a Parking Lot, but Library patrons must be better drivers because "public safety" is not an issue. Library aatrons can park while AFM or Balfour or YMCA patrons can't. Ridiculous. This might be discrimination against vegetable lovers!
Reason
12:34 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Absolutely pathetic, three hours and 15 votes spent discouraging visitors to the city. So, city leaders, what are you doing to bring people to the downtown area?
VSF
12:34 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
A sad day for Attleboro. It should be stated that the AFM set up at least 2 meetings with the library to discuss this and the invitations were declined. No one bad guy here but the council made it clear their opinion on supporting small business. In addition safety or some other reason...if the market was wanted it would have been worked out. In addition a councilor suggested ..."there must be at least 10 locations I can think of for this market..." unfortunatley all 10 and then some were investigated and either were rejected by the city or the cost for taxes and insurance on a private lot would make that choice out of the question too. "Why can't we all just get along" when it comes to a good thing for downtown...clearly because the city doesn't want it.
Migsy
7:47 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
I'd like to hear that councilor say where those places are.
Richard W. Lunt
1:07 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
I was amused when watching last night's council meeting. Spending hours going over the use of a parking lot? The Farmers market is a good idea and I'm glad that it is expanding. The councilor who said it best and knows the impact on our business if the market leaves is councilor Richard Conti who said that he would not support the Denela ammendment because it will boot the market from Attleboro. It seems to me that this special committee that was formed to find a solution to the farmers market/library feud should be looking to find an alternative location for the market. My suggestion is to consider using the Balfour Riverwalk park for the farmers market location. The lot near the library could be used for vendors who need to park their vehicles after unloading equipment for the market, handicapped patrons who wish to visit the market, and the rest of the lot can be used for library patrons. The parking lot on the other side of the Balfour Riverwalk park could be used for general parking for the farmers market in addition, market patrons could also use the parking garage accross from the YMCA. The Balfour Riverwalk park is in a central location in downtown and makes perfect sense for the market and I wonder if anyone on the city council has thought about this.
Adam Chamberlain
1:15 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Richard, I too brought this up in the comments of a previous article regarding the Farmer's Market. It was mentioned that the council rejected the proposal to have the Farmer's Market on Balfour Riverwalk due to "Too much foot traffic." (pause for laughter)
I agree it is an obvious place that allows the parking lot to be used for parking cars.
It seems to me the council is very safety conscious. They look out for the safety of people in parking lots, and they also look out for the safety of the grass in Balfour Riverwalk from too many people walking on it.
Reason
3:55 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
The lot on the other side of the Balfour Riverwalk is private property though the owner is generous enough to allow people to park there. The Balfour Riverwalk would be a great place for the market. There is already a walkway in place to handle the foot traffic and a couple cement area which would work well for vending. But this would no doubt just replace the library with the recreation department as foes.
Unfortunately I don't see the administration ever backing the farmers market. Stubborn politics has gotten in the way of a good thing.
Migsy
7:48 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
A perfect solution. Please call the Mayor and the Park Commission and tell them.
Richard W. Lunt
1:37 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Adam,
I agree that "Too much foot traffic" is a lame excuse for not allowing the market to be there. Safety of the grass?? Since when is walking on grass harmful??? Shame on the council for rejecting the proposal based on such a silly and lame idea. Maybe this current council should and I would highly urge them to review the Balfour Riverwalk as a proposed site. Again, as I said the riverwalk is a perfect location for the market.
Adam Chamberlain
3:15 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Agreed
Adam Tellier
3:49 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
The real reason who they denied the use of Balfour Riverwalk park is because of chapter 12-3.3 "Prohibited activities" subsection u, of the Revised Ordinances of the City of Attleboro, which eliminates all solicitation on any parks in Attleboro. To the best of my knowledge, this was the actual reason for not using the Balfour park. If I am wrong, this should be the real reason.
Migsy
7:56 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
@ A. Tellier. I understand the reason AFM was turned down for Balfour was too many people "would hurt the grass'. If you believe 12-3.3 then call the police when the fireworks occur.
Carol Bragg
1:53 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Aren't there other options? Why not try the high school parking lot or some other location that's not filled on a Saturday?
Gretchen Robinson
4:15 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
I see the usual negativity and bashing away at the Library, and now the City Councilors who got compared to women!!! Can you guys (Tizzy) hear yourself, how sexist that is. Your macho swagger is showing. Testosterone says you can't look after public safety?? Who died and made you pope of the world? Did you contact the Attleboro Farmer's Market or Mr. Conti or the other City Councilor and offer your help??? No, I imagine not. Armchair 'executive critics' and bashers and blamers just want to complain and feel superior to the people who are trying to make it work, but are temporarily stymied.
Did you ever hear the phrase, "it ain't over till it's over." There has got to be a way to provide a place for the FM. I never liked that site. It's too small and parking is tight. Many people parked elsewhere. As the FM grows it's bound to need a larger site. Plus it's boiling hot in the full sun some days. You got to think of the elders, too. A place with some shade wouldn't be amiss. And that's not masculine or feminine. That's just caring about making it a good time for everyone.
Migsy
8:02 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
The Porreca's have stated numerous times that AFM can NOT grow. They both work and have 3 children. They do not get any financial reward for bettering the community. They have no more time to give and growing the market would take time. Call the Mayor. Ask for Balfour.
Roxanne Houghton
4:26 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Jonathan Weydt, the Ward 4 City Councilor. has filed for Reconsideration of Vote - the vote that was taken last nite regarding the Farmers Market! Good for him!!! The actual filing is meeting resistance from the usual suspects. This filing is the right of every city council member - lets not be trying to re- write the rules when it comes to the Farmers Market....If you care about this issue - call your city councilor - support Mr Weydt's Reconsideration. Remind your Representative that he/she works for YOU. YOU pay their stipend, and in many cases, their health insurance and their pension. You do so because they work to represent you - not just at election time. Everyone here says that they support the Farmers Market - make those calls and voice your opinion - if you dont, you shouldnt complain.
Thank-you, Councilor Weydt, for hearing your constituants,
Migsy
8:04 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Amen. And call the Mayor. He can make it happen.
Just sayin'
10:46 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Yes, thank you Mr. Weydt!
Tisiphone
4:34 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
There seems to be little understanding of "safety". Please see my post on the "police power" and "public safety". What it boils down to is if you want to achieve a result without a good reason, you claim "safety". Since "safety" is not quantifiable, few courts will substitute their judgment for that of a local authority.
As I mentioned, "safety" is the only justification for zoning. It long ago reached the point where Zoning was used to protect property values in Massachusetts (this is not related to public safety and is not a legitimate government function). The legislature had to a pass an "anti Snob zoning" law.
Richard W. Lunt
4:38 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Adam Tellier,
Your example sounds more plausible than too much foot traffic. My question though is this: Is the farmers market really a form of solicitation? The people who attend the market aren't being forced into buying anything and the farmers at the market aren't using any solicitation tactics, strong or otherwise. The fact of the matter is that it's a person's own choosing if someone wants to buy something at the farmers market. With that being said, in theory, the farmers market wouldn't be breaking any city ordinances. In my opinion the real reason that the council denied the use of the riverwalk for the market is plain old politics as usual. In my humble opinion, the current members of the council should seriously consider the balfour riverwalk as a viable location for the market, It's the best location for the event.
Roxanne Houghton
4:56 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Richard
The Balfour River Walk was denied.
Adam Tellier
5:21 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
With all due respect Mr. Lunt, I feel that your assumptions are inaccurate. My explanation above was fairly superficial. If you would like to review the actual language of the ordinance, here is the link: http://www.cityofattleboro.us/pdf/obook.pdf . The language is that there shall not be any form of sale on city park property. Please excuse my simple summarization.
Just sayin'
10:40 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Call the councilors and ask them directly. I was told there was potential for damage and that is why the Parks Dept had to deny the space - and that the actual denial was from the state. I was not told that there was an ordinance (although that makes sooo much more sense!!!). I agree w/ Mr. Cooper - dizzying!!!
My next question is do we have to get the folks involved on the state level?
Kramer
5:28 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
According to these comments, I wonder how many of the people commenting here offered options. It seems like the AFM and their followers are as stubborn as the other side of the controversy. Plus, it also seems if they were the only people in Attleboro that vote… It's time for some objectivity!
As far as I know, the AFM were offered options that they did not want. I support farmer markets around New England but let's not loose perspective that this is a private business, not a government agency, and that the parking lot is city owned. The people that want to buy at a farmers market will go wherever it is located. The market can be set up in a lot of places, the library can not. Just a thought...
Roxanne Houghton
5:51 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
EKramer
What other sites are you sure that they were offered?
Richard W. Lunt
7:06 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Adam,
If indeed that is the case, according to the ordinance, then how come there have been other events at locations such as Capron Park in which the sale of items (food, etc) have occured. It seems that the city is playing politics with this particular event (The Farmers Market) If the city of Attleboro and the powers that be really wanted the farmers market to be here, they would do everything to make that happen. I just hope that there could be a way to find a good location within the downtown area.
Adam Tellier
8:46 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Mr. Lunt,
Please refer to "Tisiphone"'s comment below, he has the exact language. Seeing as it says "concession stand", that would discount your point of there being food sold. These vendors are not legal "concession stand", and thus cannot sell anything on Attleboro park property.
Just sayin'
10:52 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
I can recall being at Capron Park after the Memorial Day Parade and there were vendors in the park selling ice cream (not the concession stand) as well as those amusement park kind of items (inflatable balls, silly hats, noisemakers, etc). Maybe they were not supposed to be there, but I clearly remember this.
Tisiphone
7:42 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
I looked up the ordinance relied on "u. Sell, or offer for sale, except at the zoo gift shop and concession stands, any merchandise, article, or
articles whatsoever, or to practice, carry on, conduct or solicit any trade, occupations, business, or profession."
Well, the solution is both simple and obvious, there is already an exemption for the ZOo gift shop and the concession stand. Obviously, the city needs to "wet its beak". The City needs to be offered a "piece of the action". Maybe that is what the "details" are all about. Offer plenty of "details" and you don't have to worry so much about salaries. Every year the Boston Globe publishes the highest paid policemen. The "Chief" is usualy well down the list, while patrolmen exceed $150,000.
Adam Tellier
8:37 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Maybe you are right, however, if there is an exception this one time, how can they deny access to other events?
Tisiphone
10:15 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Adam Tellier commented on the article Council Approves Farmers Market Restrictions
"Maybe you are right, however, if there is an exception this one time, how can they deny access to other events?"
It does present a problem. Ordinances are "laws" like any other, ever heard of a waiver from speed limits? Mostly the cops just agree to look the other way.
Still, ordinances are not stuck in stone like Excaliber. Perhaps another look. It is obvious that one purpose ofthe ordinance is to protect the monopoly of the concession stand, which generates a good income to the city. Perhaps they could revisit it and find a way to protect the city's monopoly while expanding uses. That is what "legislatures" are supposed to do. There is a small park at the intersection of Blackstone Blvd and Hope Street. There is aregular farmers market there,sothere must be a way. Although there is no concession stand there, perhaps it would be stepping on toes if they tried to do it in Roger Williams. It is all about zip codes, Blackstone Blvd is a wealthy Zip Code, Roger WIlliams is not. That Farmers Markets tendsto charge premium prices,they need high incomes.
Steven Scott
7:45 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Leave it to our council to screw up something sooo simple
Richard W. Lunt
8:58 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Adam,
Several years ago, there was an event held at Capron Park in which food such as hot dogs and sodas were sold and there was some sort of a music group playing there too and maybe that was years before the ordinance went into effect I don't know. The food wasn't sold at the Zoo concession stand either. It seems that the city could do something such as grant a waiver of the ordinance so the farmers market can use a location such as Balfour river walk or Capron park.
Adam Tellier
9:09 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Mr. Lunt,
Was the event run specifically by the city. Such as the summer expo or the winter festival?
Tisiphone
9:04 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
When discussions such as the City Council meeting break down into foolish and hot headed statements, it is reasonable to assume that the real causes for conflict are not being mentioned. I doubt that "safety" was the real issue, or that the city ordinance was ever even considered. There must be more.
Adam Tellier
9:08 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
How do you figure?
Tisiphone
9:21 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Adam Tellier
9:08 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
How do you figure?
Well, I have had the opportunity to observe a lot of debates. When people feel compelled to defend a position in which they have no belief, they tend to be embarrassed. What do embarrassed people do, they talk loud, make rediculous accusations, insult others, anything to avoid the matter at hand. As lawyers are supposed to say "If the law is on your side, bang on the law. If the facts are on your side,bang on the facts. If neither the law, nor the facts, favor you, bang on the table".
Richard W. Lunt
10:06 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Adam,
To answer your question, no this particular event was not run by the city. I do remember that there was some church group involved and they held something at Capron Park around June maybe about six or seven years ago and they sold food there. Again, this might have happened before this ordinance was even considered by the council, I don't know though.
Tisiphone
10:27 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
If you think a Framer's Market is a problem, try opening a push cart hot dog stand in Attleboro. Then you will really learn about problems.
There was one at the Attleboro - North Attleboro border, is it Toner Blvd? He was finally driven out. If I recall correctly, the problem was not providing a bathroom. It was just a push cart, similar to what you see on every street corner in Manhattan. How do New Yorkers survive without a bathroom on every pushcart?
It is part of "the way" in Massachusetts. We have stacked regulation on top of regulation but it is seldom seen by your "average citizen". Ask anyone who tried to add a deck to their house and found that the backyard was "wetlands".
Just sayin'
10:57 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Huh. Not unlike that poor lady with the cupcake shop.
Lisa Mingo
6:07 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012
The library missed a golden opportunity to jump in and set up a tent and draw interest into their facility. Given their on-line competition (Amazon and Borders) and use of popular Kindles, etc, they are losing an audience. Have a weekly used book sale, showcase local authors, live story time for kids, pair a book theme with a cooking demonstration using local produce.... The library blew it. When else do they have the opportunity to gather that many people in their own yard?
Tisiphone
7:40 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012
LIsa, truely excellent thinking.
paul
7:59 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012
True that Lisa!
Mary Smith
5:48 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012
It just seems anything good that comes to Attleboro is destroyed. The libray and market should be able to co-exist. I am appauled that our city leaders act like such childern.
Quite frankly, it is absurd to require a police detail. Before long I will be required by law to have my owm personal body guard to protect me, mif I don't want to bothing ( looking both ways) before crossing a street....as for the library....make the most of the added customers you might have.........to have the market move to another community would be a shame, but typical of how business goes in Attleboro
Joe Pintapyramidadodecahedron
10:37 am on Saturday, April 7, 2012
White Alligator for Zoo 2 month rental $8000, Police Details for Farmers Market approx $5760, City Council-Library-Farmers Market "Safety" Debate and plan- PRICELESS!
EVP
8:08 am on Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Progressive Liberals on the city council taking care of their Police Union brothers to the detriment to local business. I have been to the Farmers Market many times and never felt like the public was in danger. City Council members need to go get real jobs.